A horrible Flat-Earth book, by a horrible human being

63 views
Skip to first unread message

Marcus D. Leech

unread,
Apr 14, 2026, 11:43:01 AM (4 days ago) Apr 14
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
Amazon is currently selling a new book, "Welcome to Flat Earth". Written
by someone who is a horrible human being, and a big fan of
  that Austrian fellow with the funny mustache.

I've read parts of it, in .pdf form.  It is, as you might expect,
nonsense.    I've left an excoriating review myself, and I'm hoping that
some of you
  will as well.

The more negative (1 star) reviews, the less likely it is to get
promoted by Amazon.   It's not really that the content is complete
dreck, it's that the people
  benefiting from sales are monsters.


Thomas F Davis

unread,
Apr 14, 2026, 1:07:16 PM (4 days ago) Apr 14
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
Sure, send the pdf link

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
For more options, visit this group at
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.

Marcus D. Leech

unread,
Apr 14, 2026, 4:45:10 PM (4 days ago) Apr 14
to sara...@googlegroups.com

jpett...@gmail.com

unread,
Apr 14, 2026, 5:14:31 PM (3 days ago) Apr 14
to sara...@googlegroups.com

A question or two for them:

 

Is Earth the only flat object in the Universe, why?

 

If Earth is not the only flat object in the Universe, then why, when we look at objects through a telescope, do we not see the “edge-on” view of said objects? Everything we see appears to be round, implying that we either see the objects “face on” all the time, or more likely that the objects are spheres.

 

I do not expect any discussion on this!!!!

Marcus D. Leech

unread,
Apr 14, 2026, 5:36:10 PM (3 days ago) Apr 14
to sara...@googlegroups.com
On 2026-04-14 17:14, jpett...@gmail.com wrote:

A question or two for them:

 

Is Earth the only flat object in the Universe, why?

 

If Earth is not the only flat object in the Universe, then why, when we look at objects through a telescope, do we not see the “edge-on” view of said objects? Everything we see appears to be round, implying that we either see the objects “face on” all the time, or more likely that the objects are spheres.

 

I do not expect any discussion on this!!!!

Indeed, if debunking this nonsense interests any of you, there are plenty of discord servers and YT channels where the debunkers hang out.  No need to have those
 discussions here.


Robert Brown

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 12:02:48 AM (3 days ago) Apr 15
to sara...@googlegroups.com
If the earth were round the wind would have blown all the air into space by now.

Alex P

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 6:12:06 AM (3 days ago) Apr 15
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers
If the Earth is 'Flat"  is the other side inhabited ? [by Aliens ???]
How Thick is it ? 

Robert Brown

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 6:53:47 AM (3 days ago) Apr 15
to sara...@googlegroups.com
Yes.  That's where China is.  That's how things get here so fast when you order them.  They come through that not-so-proverbial "hole to China".

On Wed, Apr 15, 2026 at 4:12 AM 'Alex P' via Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers <sara...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
If the Earth is 'Flat"  is the other side inhabited ? [by Aliens ???]
How Thick is it ? 

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.

b alex pettit jr

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 7:22:40 AM (3 days ago) Apr 15
to sara...@googlegroups.com
If the E is thin, it must contain 'off the Periodic Table'  incredibly dense material to create a 1g force..
or we are all accelerating very quickly "UpWard"  @ 32 ft/sec^2 .... lets see what would our velocity be now after 4 billion years ??

fasleitung3

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 7:56:32 AM (3 days ago) Apr 15
to sara...@googlegroups.com
Yes indeed! The other side is inhabitated by anti-radio astronomers.
They observe anti-hydrogen which is sucking energy from their telescopes creating absorption lines.

Wolfgang

Robert Brown

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 8:09:10 AM (3 days ago) Apr 15
to sara...@googlegroups.com
No gravity.  The earth sucks.

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.

Marcus D. Leech

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 10:38:06 AM (3 days ago) Apr 15
to sara...@googlegroups.com
On 2026-04-15 07:22, 'b alex pettit jr' via Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers wrote:
If the E is thin, it must contain 'off the Periodic Table'  incredibly dense material to create a 1g force..
or we are all accelerating very quickly "UpWard"  @ 32 ft/sec^2 .... lets see what would our velocity be now after 4 billion years ??
There's a sub-group of these cretins who believe in the "upward acceleration model".

Many of them are profoundly gullible.  If you came up with a credible-ish sounding "theory" that was perpendicular to objective
  reality, they'd eat it up.

But, really, I absolutely don't want to side-track this group any further on the subject.  If you feel motivated, you can leave an
  excoriating review for the book, if not, no biggy.


--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.

Ayushman Tripathi

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 4:17:34 PM (3 days ago) Apr 15
to Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers

I wonder why they can’t just test it directly with their own privately launched satellite. It would let them verify the true shape of the Earth, if they don't believe NASA etc. 😄

Marcus D. Leech

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 4:24:11 PM (3 days ago) Apr 15
to sara...@googlegroups.com
On 2026-04-15 16:17, Ayushman Tripathi wrote:

I wonder why they can’t just test it directly with their own privately launched satellite. It would let them verify the true shape of the Earth, if they don't believe NASA etc. 😄

Because nobody who has the kind of deepish pockets that could support a project like that would ever waste their money on these fools.

I spent a decade playing in the amateur rocketry sandbox.  Even a very-high sub-orbital flight is a significant technical and financial challenge.   A few of them have
  started high-altitude balloon projects, but fumbled them in various ways.   They absolutely discount footage from amateur rockets (there's some out there), and
  amateur high-altitude balloon flights.   They are decidedly evidence-resistant, choosing to claim that any evidence that fails to support their position must be
  either "fake" or literally from Satan herself.  These people are deeply deeply entrenched in a world of dangerous ignorance.  But many of them are simply
  "stupid but harmless".  Some of them, like the authors of the book I referenced, have anti-science views that are embedded in a much darker narrative of
  things like white supremacy, misogyny, etc, etc.  Those are the ones it's worth spending a few moments to disrupt their path...



On Wednesday, April 15, 2026 at 6:12:06 AM UTC-4 Alex P wrote:
If the Earth is 'Flat"  is the other side inhabited ? [by Aliens ???]
How Thick is it ? 
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.

Robert Brown

unread,
Apr 15, 2026, 5:08:53 PM (2 days ago) Apr 15
to sara...@googlegroups.com
You used a four-letter word..."test".  It's almost as offensive as "fact".

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages