Hi Whitham,
The pdf you attached states “For certain HAARP experiments that deal with interactions in the ionosphere, transmission frequencies below f_0F2 are desireable, while for other experiments (such as those involving high-altitude satellites), staying above f_0F2 is required.” Isn’t the Earth’s plasmosphere entirely connected in terms of at least nonlinear secondary emission at other frequencies other than <f_0F2 for strong enough f_0F2 emission?
Is that a real UAFHAARP explanation? Because it doesn’t sound entirely accurate. I question that satellites are specific to monitoring <f_0F2 phenomenon in particular in your attached pdf.
I thought the stepwise conversion to various parts of the plasmosphere were just a modifying Frequency-modulation/continuous wave.
Thanks,
Michael Sabino
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To post to this group, send email to sara...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sara-list-...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sara-list?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Society of Amateur Radio Astronomers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sara-list+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sara-list/29a9b2ce-8bea-49d6-a453-5833dce82d81n%40googlegroups.com.