Re: sanskrit-samiti@googlegroups.com का संक्षिप्त सारांश - 1 विषय में 1 संदेश

[Siddharth Kumar]

Dear Shrikant

 

Aindra sanskrit vyakran is supposed to be the first vyakran of sanskrit. Whatever we know about this school is through various references made in other texts including Charak, Susruta, Mahabharat, some other grammars and some of the Puranas.

 

The exact grammar is not available right now. As of now only two sutras are available and they suggest that it also contained Pratyahars as those in Panini's grammar.

 

One of the shlokas in mahabharata states that Indras Grammar contained around 25000 sutras i.e it was at least 25 times that of Panini's grammar. In recent times 'Kaatantra' is supposed to be a derivative of the Aindra Grammar.

 

 

I know i could not do justice to your question but then it is all i know about Aindra Vyakaran, rest there are great scholars in this group and probably they'll be able to throw some more light on this.

 

 

 

 

2010/1/8 <sanskrit-sa...@googlegroups.com>

  आज का विषय सारांश

समूह: http://groups.google.com/group/sanskrit-samiti/topics

• पाणिनि : व्याकरण शास्त्र के श्रेष्ठ रचनाकार [1 अपडेट]

 विषय: पाणिनि : व्याकरण शास्त्र के श्रेष्ठ रचनाकार

"SriKanth!" <srika...@gmail.com> Jan 07 06:35AM -0800 ^
 
Dear Siddharth sir,
 
I am a newbie sanskrit student. I gathered a lot of information from
your email. I immensely thank you.
Could you give some more details on Aindara school of grammar?
और...

[SriKanth!]

Dear Siddharth sir,

Thanks for sharing this information. I am much obliged.

After asking you, i kept searching on the details of Aindara vyakaran
in internet and came across this book.

Its freely downloadable in PDF/DjVu format.
http://www.archive.org/details/onaindraschools00burngoog

I am yet to read this book. At this point, I haven't even got my basic
sanskrit right, so I sigh myself it would take decades for me to
understand these things anyway.

Wish you wonderful Sankranti divas.

Srikanth.

On Jan 11, 8:52 am, Siddharth Kumar <siddharthsem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Shrikant
>
> Aindra sanskrit vyakran is supposed to be the first vyakran of sanskrit.
> Whatever we know about this school is through various references made in
> other texts including Charak, Susruta, Mahabharat, some other grammars and
> some of the Puranas.
>
> The exact grammar is not available right now. As of now only two sutras are
> available and they suggest that it also contained Pratyahars as those in
> Panini's grammar.
>
> One of the shlokas in mahabharata states that Indras Grammar contained
> around 25000 sutras i.e it was at least 25 times that of Panini's grammar.
> In recent times 'Kaatantra' is supposed to be a derivative of the Aindra
> Grammar.
>
> I know i could not do justice to your question but then it is all i know
> about Aindra Vyakaran, rest there are great scholars in this group and
> probably they'll be able to throw some more light on this.
>

> 2010/1/8 <sanskrit-sa...@googlegroups.com<sanskrit-samiti%2Bno...@googlegroups.com>

>
>
>
> >   आज का विषय सारांश
>
> > समूह:http://groups.google.com/group/sanskrit-samiti/topics
>

> >    - पाणिनि : व्याकरण शास्त्र के श्रेष्ठ रचनाकार<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=js&ver=qEnx5VtnzxI.en....>[1 अपडेट]
>
> >  विषय: पाणिनि : व्याकरण शास्त्र के श्रेष्ठ रचनाकार<http://groups.google.com/group/sanskrit-samiti/t/e724dede323af43e>
>
> >    "SriKanth!" <srikant...@gmail.com> Jan 07 06:35AM -0800 ^<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=js&ver=qEnx5VtnzxI.en....>

>
> >    Dear Siddharth sir,
>
> >    I am a newbie sanskrit student. I gathered a lot of information from
> >    your email. I immensely thank you.
> >    Could you give some more details on Aindara school of grammar?

> >    और...<http://groups.google.com/group/sanskrit-samiti/msg/573ec5df08507b77>

[siddharth]

Dear Shrikant,

Thanks for the pointer to the book and the delay in response is
attributed to that book only. I have been through this book and what
all i could conclude is that the author wanted to prove that Aindra
Grammar is older to Panini's. As i have written earlier Aindra Grammar
is probably the first grammar on sanskrit. In fact researches have
revealed that prior to Panini there were at least 23 Grammarians of
which if i remember correctly 6 have been named by Panini himself. The
book as i had mentioned earlier derives things out of Katantra.

Regards
Siddharth

On Jan 13, 6:31 pm, "SriKanth!" <srikant...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear Siddharth sir,
>
> Thanks for sharing this information. I am much obliged.
>
> After asking you, i kept searching on the details of Aindara vyakaran
> in internet and came across this book.
>

> Its freely downloadable in PDF/DjVu format.http://www.archive.org/details/onaindraschools00burngoog

>
> I am yet to read this book. At this point, I haven't even got my basic
> sanskrit right, so I sigh myself it would take decades for me to
> understand these things anyway.
>
> Wish you wonderful Sankranti divas.
>
> Srikanth.
>
> On Jan 11, 8:52 am, Siddharth Kumar <siddharthsem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Dear Shrikant
>
> > Aindra sanskrit vyakran is supposed to be the first vyakran of sanskrit.
> > Whatever we know about this school is through various references made in
> > other texts including Charak, Susruta, Mahabharat, some other grammars and
> > some of the Puranas.
>
> > The exact grammar is not available right now. As of now only two sutras are
> > available and they suggest that it also contained Pratyahars as those in
> > Panini's grammar.
>
> > One of the shlokas in mahabharata states that Indras Grammar contained
> > around 25000 sutras i.e it was at least 25 times that of Panini's grammar.
> > In recent times 'Kaatantra' is supposed to be a derivative of the Aindra
> > Grammar.
>
> > I know i could not do justice to your question but then it is all i know
> > about Aindra Vyakaran, rest there are great scholars in this group and
> > probably they'll be able to throw some more light on this.
>

> > 2010/1/8 <sanskrit-sa...@googlegroups.com<sanskrit-samiti%2Bnoreply@googleg­roups.com>

>
> > >   आज का विषय सारांश
>
> > > समूह:http://groups.google.com/group/sanskrit-samiti/topics
>
> > >    - पाणिनि : व्याकरण शास्त्र के श्रेष्ठ रचनाकार<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=js&ver=qEnx5VtnzxI.en....>[1 अपडेट]
>
> > >  विषय: पाणिनि : व्याकरण शास्त्र के श्रेष्ठ रचनाकार<http://groups.google.com/group/sanskrit-samiti/t/e724dede323af43e>
>
> > >    "SriKanth!" <srikant...@gmail.com> Jan 07 06:35AM -0800 ^<http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&view=js&name=js&ver=qEnx5VtnzxI.en....>
>
> > >    Dear Siddharth sir,
>
> > >    I am a newbie sanskrit student. I gathered a lot of information from
> > >    your email. I immensely thank you.
> > >    Could you give some more details on Aindara school of grammar?

> > >    और...<http://groups.google.com/group/sanskrit-samiti/msg/573ec5df08507b77>- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

[Surendra Mohan Mishra]

//shriih//

Dear Scholars,

Namo namah !

May i add some observation to the ongoing discussion i just came across. Why six,Panini has quoted at least 10 former grammarians.Indra is counted as one of the eight shaabdikas,perhaps the foremost among them.The Mahaabhaarata is believed to be according to the Aindra school of grammar.But may be many schools of grammar were in vogue.In MBh while commencing to compose about Vyaasa it is said : dristvaa bahu vyaakaranam as also is quoted by Narayana Bhatta in his Apaaniniiya-praamaanya-saadhanam.Thre was a great tradition of grammatical and lexical enterprise perhaps even before the Praatishaakhyas and the Braahmanas !

Regards,
Surendramohan Mishra

[siddharth]

Dear Surendra Ji,
Thanks for the feedback. You are absolutely right Patanjali has quoted
10 grammarians
1. Shakalya
2. Bhardwaj
3. Sphotayan
4. Gargya
5.Shakatayan
6. Galav
7. Kashyap
8. Apishali
9. Senak
10. Chakravarman

These ar the grammarians quoted in Shabdanushashnam. I apologise for
the information given earlier.

Thanks
Siddharth

On Feb 12, 8:51 pm, Surendra Mohan Mishra

<dr.surendramohanmishra....@gmail.com> wrote:
> > //shriih//
>
> Dear Scholars,
>
> Namo namah !
>
> May i add some observation to the ongoing discussion i just came across. Why
> six,Panini has quoted at least 10 former grammarians.Indra is counted as one
> of the eight shaabdikas,perhaps the foremost among them.The Mahaabhaarata is
> believed to be according to the Aindra school of grammar.But may be many
> schools of grammar were in vogue.In MBh while commencing to compose about

> Vyaasa it is said : *dristvaa bahu vyaakaranam* as also is quoted by
> Narayana Bhatta in his *Apaaniniiya-praamaanya-saadhanam*.Thre was a great

> tradition of grammatical and lexical enterprise perhaps even before

> the*Praatishaakhya
> *s and the* Braahmana*s !
>
> Regards,
> Surendramohan Mishra

[Bholanath Dash]

Respected Scholars,

Namaste

I am very glad to recive such kind of thing. I have some doubt in udatta accent. what ever mentioned in Kaumudi of Bhattojidikshita and in Kashika that is correct or some  other explanation need for this. Kindly Suggest me.

2010/3/11 siddharth <siddhar...@gmail.com>

sanskri...@googlegroups.com is a contact of baiju nanda
Approve sender

Dear Surendra Ji,
Thanks for the feedback. You are absolutely right Patanjali has quoted
10 grammarians
1. Shakalya
2. Bhardwaj
3. Sphotayan
4. Gargya
5.Shakatayan
6. Galav
7. Kashyap
8. Apishali
9. Senak
10. Chakravarman

These ar the grammarians quoted in Shabdanushashnam. I apologise for
the information given earlier.

Thanks
Siddharth

On Feb 12, 8:51 pm, Surendra Mohan Mishra
<dr.surendramohanmishra....@gmail.com> wrote:

> > //shriih//
>
> Dear Scholars,
>
> Namo namah !
>
> May i add some observation to the ongoing discussion i just came across. Why
> six,Panini has quoted at least 10 former grammarians.Indra is counted as one
> of the eight shaabdikas,perhaps the foremost among them.The Mahaabhaarata is
> believed to be according to the Aindra school of grammar.But may be many
> schools of grammar were in vogue.In MBh while commencing to compose about

> Vyaasa it is said : *dristvaa bahu vyaakaranam* as also is quoted by
> Narayana Bhatta in his *Apaaniniiya-praamaanya-saadhanam*.Thre was a great

> tradition of grammatical and lexical enterprise perhaps even before

[krishna joshi]

--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Bholanath Dash <bholana...@gmail.com> wrote:

Are there any subjects left for research in sanskrit with special reference to science ?

[Rakesh Das]

Respected sir,

for the correct accent you should consult the Praatisakhyas and sikSaas specially paniniya, vyasa, kaundinya and yajnavalkya sikSaas.

Rakesh Das.

2010/3/16 krishna joshi <kvj...@yahoo.com>

--
वंशीविभूषितकरान्नवनीरदाभात्
पीताम्बरादरुणबिम्बफलाधरोष्ठात्।
पूर्णेन्दुसुन्दरमुखादरविन्दनेत्रात्
कृष्णात्परं किमपि तत्त्वमहं न जाने।।
भारत माता की जय

[pandey ramanath]

Yes, there are several subjects. But what do you mean? pls. explain
clearly as almost in all fields work are to be done in the context of
modern science. I am writing in English because yoy asked question
in eng. Pls use either Hindi or Sanskrit language in this forum.

On 16/03/2010, krishna joshi <kvj...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> --- On Fri, 3/12/10, Bholanath Dash <bholana...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> From: Bholanath Dash <bholana...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: sanskri...@googlegroups.com का संक्षिप्त सारांश - 1 विषय
> में 1 संदेश *
> To: sanskri...@googlegroups.com
> Date: Friday, March 12, 2010, 10:01 AM
>
>
>
> Respected Scholars,
> Namaste
> I am very glad to recive such kind of thing. I have some doubt in udatta
> accent. what ever mentioned in Kaumudi of Bhattojidikshita and in
> Kashika that is correct or some  other explanation need for this. Kindly
> Suggest me.
>
>
> 2010/3/11 siddharth <siddhar...@gmail.com>
>
>
> sanskri...@googlegroups.com is a contact of baiju nanda
> Approve sender
>

--
rnp

[hn bhat]

Thanks Surendraji,

 

10 grammarians
1. Shakalya - sambuddhau zAkalyasya-itAv anArSe  || PS_1,1.16 ||
 2. Bhardwaja - Rto bhAradvAjasya  || PS_7,2.63 ||
3. Sphotayan - ava~N sphoTAyanasya  || PS_6,1.123 ||
4. Gargya  -  aD gArgyagAlavayoH  || PS_7,3.99 ||

5.Shakatayana - la~NaH shAkaTAyanasya+eva  || PS_3,4.111 || also in PS_8,3.18 ||, PS_8,4.50|| etc.

6. Galava - tRtIyAdiSu bhASitapuMskaM puMvad gAlavasya  || PS_7,1.74 ||

7. Kashyapa - tRSi-mRSi-kRzeH kAzyapasya  || PS_1,2.25 ||
8. Apishali - vA supyApizaleH  || PS_6,1.92 ||

9. Senaka - giresh ca  || PS_5,4.112 ||

10. Chakravarmana - I>> caakravarmaNasya || PS_6,1.130 ||

named by Panini in his AshTAdhyAyI as per the references above.

With regards

 

2010/3/16 krishna joshi <kvj...@yahoo.com>

--- On Fri, 3/12/10, Bholanath Dash <bholana...@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Bholanath Dash <bholana...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: sanskri...@googlegroups.com का संक्षिप्त सारांश - 1 विषय में 1 संदेश * To: sanskri...@googlegroups.com Date: Friday, March 12, 2010, 10:01 AM

Respected Scholars, Namaste I am very glad to recive such kind of thing. I have some doubt in udatta accent. what ever mentioned in Kaumudi of Bhattojidikshita and in Kashika that is correct or some  other explanation need for this. Kindly Suggest me.

2010/3/11 siddharth <siddhar...@gmail.com> sanskri...@googlegroups.com is a contact of baiju nanda Approve sender Dear Surendra Ji, Thanks for the feedback. You are absolutely right Patanjali has quoted

These ar the grammarians quoted in Shabdanushashnam. I apologise for

the information given earlier. Thanks Siddharth On Feb 12, 8:51 pm, Surendra Mohan Mishra <dr.surendramohanmishra....@gmail.com> wrote: > > //shriih// > > Dear Scholars, > > Namo namah ! > > May i add some observation to the ongoing discussion i just came across. Why > six,Panini has quoted at least 10 former grammarians.Indra is counted as one > of the eight shaabdikas,perhaps the foremost among them.The Mahaabhaarata is > believed to be according to the Aindra school of grammar.But may be many > schools of grammar were in vogue.In MBh while commencing to compose about > Vyaasa it is said : *dristvaa bahu vyaakaranam* as also is quoted by > Narayana Bhatta in his *Apaaniniiya-praamaanya-saadhanam*.Thre was a great > tradition of grammatical and lexical enterprise perhaps even before > the*Praatishaakhya > *s and the* Braahmana*s ! > > Regards, > Surendramohan Mishra

Are there any subjects left for research in sanskrit with special reference to science ?

--
Dr. Hari Narayana Bhat B.R.
EFEO,
PONDICHERRY