SANJHA SAMVAD group bringing change in policy at national level-Food security bill
vinod pandey
Dear all,
Greetings!
Few months back Caritas India had initiated discussion ( through Sanjha Samvad group of LIFE & HARIT PRAYAS project and 104 members from various national and international organisation ) on amendments in National Food security bill and after long discussion group has submitted a proposed amendment plan to Prime Minister Office-PMO ( attached is the suubmitted plan in July 2012) and now almost after a year central govt cabinet has finally passed ( on 19th March 2013) the National Food Security Bill and good to see the Impact of Caritas India and Sanjha Samvad group members that good number of ammendments are accepted by govt. especially in terms of coverage of population. You can read the proposed plan and finally approved plan. This is one of the biggest success of the SANJHA SAMVAD group (initiated through projects of Caritas India) in bring out the change in national level policy!
SANJHA SAMVAD group has started on Feb 2011 through a small meeting under LIFE project of Caritas India
To Join Sanjha Samvad write to sanjha...@gmail.com
Regards
Vinod Pandey
|
Major concerns related with food security |
What was initial proposed National Food security Bill by govt states? |
What we (Sanjha Samvad) are proposed in July 2012? |
Now What Cabinet has passed on 19th March 2013?
|
|
PROPORTION OF POPULATION COVERED |
Legal entitlement to subsidized food grains to be extended to at least 75% of the country’s population - 90% in Rural areas and 50% in urban areas and that too based on the prioritization of APL and BPL |
Cover 100% of rural population and 100 % of urban poor (must be clearly mentioned urban poor) irrespective of any prioritization i.e. BPL or APL in distribution of food grains. Prioritization in distribution of food on the basis of BPL & APL has many loopholes and there are BPL families who have APL cards and there are APL families who have BPL cards. So when we discuss for coverage coverage would not be only limited to the category of people rather it would reach to all and serve the purpose of addressing food security issue. |
"Uniform prices of Rs 3, 2 and 1 per kg for rice, wheat and coarse grains, respectively, will be applicable to all eligible beneficiaries. The prices would be revised after three years from the implementation of the Act,". Almost covering 67-70% of population ( including Urban & rural) in total 100% of rural and urban poor population. |
|
AMOUNT & PRICING UNDER FOOD SECURITY BILL |
The priority households (46% in rural areas and 28% in urban areas) to have a monthly entitlement of 35 Kgs (equivalent to 7 Kgs per person) at a subsidized price of Rs. 1 per Kg for millets, Rs. 2 per Kg for wheat and Rs. 3 per Kg for rice
The general households (39% rural and 12% urban in phase 1 and 44% rural and 22% urban in final phase) to have a monthly entitlement of 20Kgs (equivalent to 4 Kgs per person) at a price not exceeding 50% of the current Minimum Support Price for millets, wheat and rice |
Option 1: In terms of amount of food distributed there could be the possibility of “supplement” of 10 kgs per BPL household could be provided by the central government to all states that currently give 35 kgs to BPL households, for a limited period of (say) three years. This would be easy to do, since the government has large excess stocks at the moment[1].
Option 2: To distribute coupon cards to those in need of supplemental food? Cards could be used in retail shops to buy surplus grain or other specific products. The retailers would buy the stock from the governments (union/state) or government sponsored farmer coops. The shops, both large and small, would be allowed a 5-6% mark-up from the price they pay, providing them reason to be involved. It would also save the government from being a direct distributor; they'd send mystery shoppers out to ensure mark-ups are with parameters. As a buyer, government could shape better prices for farmers, and also influence retail prices as a retail supplier. Coupons may deflect inflationary pricing from direct cash payments. And as an aside, grow more tasty amaranth and high amino/protien quinoa, less wheat
Option 3: Retain and strengthen the Antyodaya programme, as it is.
|
The amendments to the Bill will guarantee 5 kg of foodgrains per person per month, while families in the poorest of the poor will continue to get 35 kg of grains per month. |
|
STORAGE OF FOOD GRAINS |
No concrete talk on it |
Distribution of food would be possible only when there would be food availability and to make food available in better condition for longer period of time, there is need of proper storage of food grains at Panchayat or village level. It has been noticed that the production of food garins is quite good but food is not able to reach to the needy because we don’t have proper storage system. So it would be vital to work on the storage of purchased food grains at village/Panchayat level on priority basis.
With the current procurement and storage capacity of a little above 42.5 million tonnes, providing 68.76 million tonnes of foodgrain in the first phase and 73.98 million tonnes in the final phase implies significant scaling up of the procurement, warehousing and supply chain operations. This involves large financial outgo which has not been quantified as yet. |
Nothing specific on it! |
|
STRENGTHENING PDS |
No discussion on it |
It is important to consider the ground reality of PDS system functioning and its reach to the community in need. As the distribution of food grains would be through the PDS, so it would be vital to work on strengthening PDS in terms of availability of food grains, timely opening and closing, proper storage of food grains, quality of food grains, proper listing of beneficiaries and display of the same at the PDS, timely supply of food grains to the PDS shop, allocation of PDS shop to SC & STs on priority basis and the shop owner must be minimum 10th pass. |
about 2.43 crore poorest of the poor families covered under the Antyodaya Anna Yojana (AAY) scheme under PDS would get legal entitlement to 35 kg of foodgrain per family per month. Also proper monitoring has taken consideration |
|
MECHANISM FOR SELLING OF FOOD GRAINS IN OPEN MARKET ( THROUGH PDS SHOP OWNERS) |
No such provisions are mentioned in the National Food security bill to combat corruption |
There will be the impact of such large government food grain procurement on the open market prices, an I turn this may lead to the corruption in terms of:
Considering the above it is vital to work on the combating mechanism of corruption in food distribution at the end level i.e. PDS shops. |
Nothing on it! |
|
ESTIMATES OF FOODGRAINS REQUIRED FOR IMPLEMENTING THE NFSB |
Estimation of requirement of food grains is on the basis of estimation of population % of October 2010
Expert committee report said that: NAC has estimated the entitled food grain requirement (PDS) for phase at 49.36 million tonnes and for the final phase at 55.59 million tonnes. These estimates are based on the assumption of 85 per cent offtake of foodgrain during Phase 1 and 90 per cent offtake of foodgrain during the Final Phase. It is understood that NAC has used the population projections of the National Commission on Population for October 2010 for estimating the grain requirement for both the phases. |
On examination, it appears that the foodgrain requirement projected by the NAC need to be revised, as population projections for October 2010 have been used by the NAC for both the phases. To obtain more realistic foodgrain requirement, EC has used the population projections pertaining to the year for Which the phases are to be implemented. In other words for phase 1, population projections for October 2011 have been used and for the final phase, projections for October 2013 have been used
|
|
|
SUBSIDY IMPLICATIONS
|
According to the NAC projections the total subsidy will work out to Rs 71,837 crores in the first phase and Rs 79,931 crores in the final phase.
|
In addition to the physical food grain requirement, the proposed NFSB has large subsidy implications. The total subsidy outgo is expected to be higher than the projections by NAC on account of a number of factors. Firstly, according to the NAC projections the total subsidy will work out to Rs 71,837 crores in the first phase and Rs 79,931 crores in the final phase. However this figure needs to be revised upwards if we change the population figures to October 2011 and 2013 projections for the two phases and assume 100 per cent off take.
|
|
[1] Foodgrain stocks stood at 54 million tonnes on 1 March 2012 (the highest-ever level for that date, just before the rabi harvest). They are expected to rise to 74 million tonnes by 1 June 2012.
VINOD PANDEY
(Project Officer North Zone)
Caritas India ,Divya Deepti Sadan,9-10 IBhai Veersingh Marg , New Delhi. 110
001
email: vinod...@caritasindia.net, www.caritasindia.org
<vinod...@caritasindia.net>
Tel: +91 11 65293191 Mob: +91 9212742881,9716529491 (Delhi) &+91 9529912881 (Common)
**
**
shipra gupta
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "SANJHA SAMVAD-a network for development" group.
To post to this group, send email to
sanjha-samvad-a-net...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sanjha-samvad-a-network-f...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sanjha-samvad-a-network-for-development?hl=en?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SANJHA SAMVAD-a network for development" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sanjha-samvad-a-network-f...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
kumar Ratan
Kumar Ratan