Hi Brandon,
I hadn't exercised the OPUS import in a while, so I just gave it a shot. This is with 1.15.0 also. I submitted a RINEX file to OPUS, selecting all default options (including Standard output as opposed to Extended, etc.) The solution came back as an email which I then copied and pasted into a text document (i.e., using notepad). I then used SALSA's Import --> Include from OPUS function and selected that file, and it imported/converted two POSG records. I was a little surprised there were two records, but looking at the OPUS results I see they provide solutions in two reference frames:
REF FRAME: NAD_83(2011)(EPOCH:2010.0000) ITRF2020 (EPOCH:2026.0013)
X: 1112162.961(m) 0.005(m) 1112161.968(m) 0.005(m)
Y: -4842856.103(m) 0.004(m) -4842854.663(m) 0.004(m)
Z: 3985497.128(m) 0.008(m) 3985497.088(m) 0.008(m)
LAT: 38 55 14.00729 0.008(m) 38 55 14.03940 0.008(m)
E LON: 282 56 1.42422 0.004(m) 282 56 1.39740 0.004(m)
W LON: 77 3 58.57578 0.004(m) 77 3 58.60260 0.004(m)
EL HGT: 60.195(m) 0.005(m) 58.905(m) 0.005(m)
ORTHO HGT: 92.186(m) 0.036(m) [NAVD88 (Computed using GEOID18)]
So SALSA imports both, and includes comments accordingly:
Assuming you're seeking maximum consistency with WGS 84, you would then deselect (or delete) the NAD_83 record and preserve the ITRF2020 record.
Let us know if this makes sense and you can reproduce these steps, or if you have further questions. Thanks,
Clark