Please apologize for the delay in my response.
I have reproduced the issue you described in my own computational environment. It appears that the Velocity Gauge semiconductor Bloch solver currently implemented in SALMON may exhibit the lack of precision in high-energy region as you mentioned. Since fully reproducing complex band structures can be challenging, there have been reports where accuracy degrades depending on the material system.
Generally, increasing the number of basis functions used for expansion may systematically reduce these errors. Therefore, it might be possible to improve the results by increasing the `nstate` parameter in your current settings.
Additionally, I believe that the length-gauge solver recently implemented in SALMON could mitigate this issue. Please allow me a little more time to investigate this further.
Sincerely,
----
Mitsuharu UEMOTO (Assist.Prof. / Ph.D.)
E-mail: uem...@eedept.kobe-u.ac.jp Phone: 078-803-6497
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering,
Graduate School of Engineering, Kobe University
植本光治(うえもとみつはる)
神戸大学大学院工学研究科電気電子工学専攻
〒657ー8501 神戸市灘区六甲台町1−1
________________________________________
差出人: ? 雅恬 <ytni...@outlook.com>
送信日時: 2026年6月1日 18:47
宛先: salmo...@salmon-tddft.jp
件名: [salmon-user:00395] HHG simulation with SBE module for SiO₂