[salmon-user:00392] sio2 band-gap

3 views
Skip to first unread message

? 雅恬

unread,
May 29, 2026, 5:57:38 AMMay 29
to salmo...@salmon-tddft.jp
Dear SALMON developers,
I am writing to seek your advice regarding a ground-state calculation of bulk SiO₂ (α-quartz) using SALMON.
My calculated fundamental band gap is only about 1.06 eV (direct gap), while the experimental band gap of SiO₂ is known to be around 9 eV. I suspect there might be some mistakes in my input settings, but I have not been able to identify the root cause.
Is there any specific input flag for SiO₂ that I might have missed?
I would greatly appreciate any suggestions or pointers to possible mistakes.
Best regards,
Yatian Ning
sio2.zip

Yamada Shunsuke

unread,
May 29, 2026, 6:36:28 AMMay 29
to salmo...@salmon-tddft.jp
Dear Dr. Yatian Ning,

Thank you for the question. 
Maybe the r-grid is too sparse. Generally, non-orthogonal cell requires relatively dence r-grid for convergence.
For better bandgap, TBmBJ exchenge-correlation functional is more suitable than LDA.
The following link is an example of input file for SiO2 used in a published paper:


Sincerely,
Shunsuke Yamada
Kansai Institute for Photon Science, QST, Japan
山田俊介
量子科学技術研究開発機構 関西光量子科学研究所



差出人: ? 雅恬 <ytni...@outlook.com>
送信日時: 2026年5月29日 18:56
宛先: salmo...@salmon-tddft.jp <salmo...@salmon-tddft.jp>
件名: [salmon-user:00392] sio2 band-gap
 

宁 雅恬

unread,
May 29, 2026, 8:32:40 AMMay 29
to salmo...@salmon-tddft.jp
Dear Yamada
Thank you for your prompt response. I will follow your advice and carry out the calculation.

Yatian Ning


发件人: Yamada Shunsuke <yamada....@qst.go.jp>
发送时间: Friday, May 29, 2026 6:35:34 PM
收件人: salmo...@salmon-tddft.jp <salmo...@salmon-tddft.jp>
主题: [salmon-user:00393] Re: sio2 band-gap
 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages