Kiran
On Mar 3, 1:05 pm, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> This release incorporates many combinatorics tickets positively
> reviewed during and/or before Sage Days 20.
>
Kiran
On Mar 3, 11:27 pm, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kiran,
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <SNIP>
>
> > See ticket #8432 for an implementation of this
> > approach.
>
> From your install log, I see that your build also has gotten past
> installing iconv. This makes me doubt that the solution at #8432 would
> solve the build problem you reported. In any event, I would like to
> know if the solution at #8432 works for your particular system.
>
> --
> Regards
> Minh Van Nguyen
The following tests failed:
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/categories/examples/finite_semigroups.py"
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/categories/finite_semigroups.py"
sage -t
"local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sagenb-0.7.5.1-py2.6.egg/sagenb/misc/sageinspect.py"
sage -t
"local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sagenb-0.7.5.1-py2.6.egg/sagenb/notebook/interact.py"
For example
sage -t "devel/sage/sage/categories/examples/finite_semigroups.py"
**********************************************************************
File "/Users/wdj/sagefiles/sage-4.3.4.alpha0/devel/sage/sage/categories/examples/finite_semigroups.py",
line 75:
sage: S.j_transversal_of_idempotents()
Expected:
['acb', 'ac', 'ab', 'bc', 'a', 'c', 'b']
Got:
['a', 'acb', 'ac', 'ab', 'cb', 'c', 'b']
**********************************************************************
1 items had failures:
1 of 14 in __main__.example_1
***Test Failed*** 1 failures.
Should I post the log somewhere?
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Minh Nguyen <nguye...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Minh Nguyen <nguye...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <SNIP>
>
>> * The following tests failed on sage.math:
>
> They also fail on bsd.math and rosemary.math. This issue is now
> tracked at ticket #8430:
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8430
>
> --
> Regards
> Minh Van Nguyen
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-r...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release?hl=en.
>
>
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... rm: cannot remove
`conftest*': No such
file or directory
yes
That makes me wonder whether iconv is getting built correctly in this
environment.
Kiran
On Mar 3, 11:27 pm, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kiran,
>
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Minh Nguyen <nguyenmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <SNIP>
>
> > See ticket #8432 for an implementation of this
> > approach.
>
> From your install log, I see that your build also has gotten past
> installing iconv. This makes me doubt that the solution at #8432 would
> solve the build problem you reported. In any event, I would like to
> know if the solution at #8432 works for your particular system.
>
I see this line repeated three times in what appears to be a successful
build of iconv on sage.math.
> That makes me wonder whether iconv is getting built correctly in this
> environment.
What happens if you add
----with-libiconv-prefix="$SAGE_LOCAL"
to
./configure --prefix="$SAGE_LOCAL" --without-jpeg --without-x
--with-zlib="$SAGE_LOCAL" --with-freetype="$SAGE_LOCAL" --without-xpm
in
gd-2.0.35.p4/spkg-install
?
Kiran