--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/473bd3ac-82f0-4de8-af46-02365c6c455dn%40googlegroups.com.
Is anyone else seeing docbuilding issues? I am getting[sagemath_doc_html-none] __import__(module_name)
[sagemath_doc_html-none] ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'sage.combinat.nu_dyck_word'which is resulting the doc not building for me via "make". I have also run "make doc-clean" and tried again with the same result. I think I have also seen this on some patchbots.
Try "make doc-clean doc-uninstall", not just "make doc-clean".
While ptest
ing an upcoming ticket (irrelevant here), I got two new permanent errors. The first one is Trac#34029, whose ix is positively_reviewed
. The second one is new, as far as I can tell :
charpent@zen-book-flip:/usr/local/sage-9$ sage -t --long --warn-long 205.0 --random-seed=17841348431377877665902196027003710887 src/sage/libs/eclib/mwrank.pyx # 1 doctest failed
Running doctests with ID 2022-07-03-17-36-25-d75ea5b2.
Git branch: develop
Git ref: 9.7.beta3
Running with SAGE_LOCAL='/usr/local/sage-9/local' and SAGE_VENV='/usr/local/sage-9/local/var/lib/sage/venv-python3.10'
Using --optional=debian,dot2tex,fricas,gap_packages,libsemigroups,mathics,mathics_scanner,palettable,pint,pip,pysingular,sage,sage_spkg
Features to be detected: 4ti2,benzene,bliss,buckygen,conway_polynomials,csdp,database_cremona_ellcurve,database_cremona_mini_ellcurve,database_jones_numfield,database_knotinfo,dvipng,gfan,graphviz,imagemagick,jupymake,kenzo,latte_int,lrslib,mcqd,meataxe,msolve,nauty,palp,pandoc,pdf2svg,pdftocairo,phitigra,plantri,polytopes_db,polytopes_db_4d,pynormaliz,python_igraph,rubiks,sage.combinat,sage.geometry.polyhedron,sage.graphs,sage.groups,sage.plot,sage.rings.number_field,sage.rings.padics,sage.rings.real_double,sage.symbolic,sage_numerical_backends_coin,sagemath_doc_html,sphinx,tdlib
Doctesting 1 file.
sage -t --long --warn-long 205.0 --random-seed=17841348431377877665902196027003710887 src/sage/libs/eclib/mwrank.pyx
**********************************************************************
File "src/sage/libs/eclib/mwrank.pyx", line 589, in sage.libs.eclib.mwrank._mw.__init__
Failed example:
EQ.search(1)
Expected:
P1 = [0:1:0] is torsion point, order 1
P1 = [-3:0:1] is generator number 1
saturating up to 20...Saturation index bound (for points of good reduction) = 3
Reducing saturation bound from given value 20 to computed index bound 3
Checking saturation at [ 2 3 ]
Checking 2-saturation
Points were proved 2-saturated (max q used = 7)
Checking 3-saturation
Points were proved 3-saturated (max q used = 7)
done
P2 = [-2:3:1] is generator number 2
saturating up to 20...Saturation index bound (for points of good reduction) = 4
Reducing saturation bound from given value 20 to computed index bound 4
Checking saturation at [ 2 3 ]
Checking 2-saturation
possible kernel vector = [1,1]
This point may be in 2E(Q): [14:-52:1]
...and it is!
Replacing old generator #1 with new generator [1:-1:1]
Reducing index bound from 4 to 2
Points have successfully been 2-saturated (max q used = 7)
Index gain = 2^1
done, index = 2.
Gained index 2, new generators = [ [1:-1:1] [-2:3:1] ]
P3 = [-14:25:8] is generator number 3
saturating up to 20...Saturation index bound (for points of good reduction) = 3
Reducing saturation bound from given value 20 to computed index bound 3
Checking saturation at [ 2 3 ]
Checking 2-saturation
Points were proved 2-saturated (max q used = 11)
Checking 3-saturation
Points were proved 3-saturated (max q used = 13)
done, index = 1.
P4 = [-1:3:1] = -1*P1 + -1*P2 + -1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [0:2:1] = 2*P1 + 0*P2 + 1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [2:13:8] = -3*P1 + 1*P2 + -1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [1:0:1] = -1*P1 + 0*P2 + 0*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [2:0:1] = -1*P1 + 1*P2 + 0*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [18:7:8] = -2*P1 + -1*P2 + -1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [3:3:1] = 1*P1 + 0*P2 + 1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [4:6:1] = 0*P1 + -1*P2 + -1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [36:69:64] = 1*P1 + -2*P2 + 0*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [68:-25:64] = -2*P1 + -1*P2 + -2*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [12:35:27] = 1*P1 + -1*P2 + -1*P3 (mod torsion)
Got:
P1 = [0:1:0] is torsion point, order 1
P1 = [-3:0:1] is generator number 1
saturating up to 20...Saturation index bound (for points of good reduction) = 3
Reducing saturation bound from given value 20 to computed index bound 3
Tamagawa index primes are [ 2 ]
Checking saturation at [ 2 3 ]
Checking 2-saturation
Points were proved 2-saturated (max q used = 7)
Checking 3-saturation
Points were proved 3-saturated (max q used = 7)
done
P2 = [-2:3:1] is generator number 2
saturating up to 20...Saturation index bound (for points of good reduction) = 4
Reducing saturation bound from given value 20 to computed index bound 4
Tamagawa index primes are [ 2 ]
Checking saturation at [ 2 3 ]
Checking 2-saturation
possible kernel vector = [1,1]
This point may be in 2E(Q): [14:-52:1]
...and it is!
Replacing old generator #1 with new generator [1:-1:1]
Reducing index bound from 4 to 2
Points have successfully been 2-saturated (max q used = 7)
Index gain = 2^1
done, index = 2.
Gained index 2, new generators = [ [1:-1:1] [-2:3:1] ]
P3 = [-14:25:8] is generator number 3
saturating up to 20...Saturation index bound (for points of good reduction) = 3
Reducing saturation bound from given value 20 to computed index bound 3
Tamagawa index primes are [ 2 ]
Checking saturation at [ 2 3 ]
Checking 2-saturation
Points were proved 2-saturated (max q used = 11)
Checking 3-saturation
Points were proved 3-saturated (max q used = 13)
done, index = 1.
P4 = [-1:3:1] = -1*P1 + -1*P2 + -1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [0:2:1] = 2*P1 + 0*P2 + 1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [2:13:8] = -3*P1 + 1*P2 + -1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [1:0:1] = -1*P1 + 0*P2 + 0*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [2:0:1] = -1*P1 + 1*P2 + 0*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [18:7:8] = -2*P1 + -1*P2 + -1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [3:3:1] = 1*P1 + 0*P2 + 1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [4:6:1] = 0*P1 + -1*P2 + -1*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [36:69:64] = 1*P1 + -2*P2 + 0*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [68:-25:64] = -2*P1 + -1*P2 + -2*P3 (mod torsion)
P4 = [12:35:27] = 1*P1 + -1*P2 + -1*P3 (mod torsion)
**********************************************************************
1 item had failures:
1 of 26 in sage.libs.eclib.mwrank._mw.__init__
[210 tests, 1 failure, 23.20 s]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sage -t --long --warn-long 205.0 --random-seed=17841348431377877665902196027003710887 src/sage/libs/eclib/mwrank.pyx # 1 doctest failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total time for all tests: 23.3 seconds
cpu time: 23.2 seconds
cumulative wall time: 23.2 seconds
Features detected for doctesting:
pytest is not installed in the venv, skip checking tests that rely on it
checking out develop
, I reproduced the same problems. These failures are therefore new develop
problems (possibly due to Debian testing evolution) rather than specific to my ticket.
Advice asked on whether and how to file the problem I believe unreported.
HTH,
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-release" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-release...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-release/306d60ee-42f0-4d19-93f9-0f68ddccac2dn%40googlegroups.com.