patchbot owners, please update to 3.0.3

[Frédéric Chapoton]

Hello,

github has removed the git: protocol. So patchbots need to be updated.

please update your patchbot to the latest available tag

Frédéric

[Frédéric Chapoton]

also patchbots have persistent problems with building docs. Can the people that changed something to doc-building please repair the patchbot accordingly ? pull request on github, please

https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/33157/

[Frédéric Chapoton]

and to fix the remaining doc-cleaning issue, please upgrade again to the master branch of github (aka tag 3.0.4)

(I would appreciate answers, rather than full silence)

Frédéric

[jonatha...@googlemail.com]

Hi Frédéric,

due to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33027 I have given up on running my patchbot.

Jonathan

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:43 AM 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via
sage-devel <sage-...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Frédéric,
>
> due to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33027 I have given up on running my patchbot.

I've made this ticket a blocker.

Everyone who has an idea about sage-cleaner, please have a look.
Naturally, pexpect interface (to maxima) is involved.

Dima

>
> Jonathan
>
> Frédéric Chapoton schrieb am Montag, 17. Januar 2022 um 21:31:31 UTC+1:
>>
>> and to fix the remaining doc-cleaning issue, please upgrade again to the master branch of github (aka tag 3.0.4)
>>
>> (I would appreciate answers, rather than full silence)
>>
>> Frédéric
>> Le vendredi 14 janvier 2022 à 21:25:11 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>>>
>>> also patchbots have persistent problems with building docs. Can the people that changed something to doc-building please repair the patchbot accordingly ? pull request on github, please
>>>
>>> https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/33157/
>>>
>>> Le vendredi 14 janvier 2022 à 17:40:27 UTC+1, Frédéric Chapoton a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>> github has removed the git: protocol. So patchbots need to be updated.
>>>> please update your patchbot to the latest available tag
>>>> Frédéric
>>>>

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/997e9f75-8e92-4a67-b43a-1777074cbe45n%40googlegroups.com.

[Samuel Lelievre]

Hi Frédéric,

I have upgraded to sage-patchbot 3.0.4 on "pascaline".

On Sage 9.5.rc2, "ticket 0" failed with

----------------------------------------------------------------------

SEED=94195001484901963602666886307845237936

alias sagetest=".sage -t --long --random-seed=$SEED"

sagetest src/sage/features/interfaces.py  # Timed out
sagetest src/sage/game_theory/parser.py  # 2 doctests failed
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll try again with Sage 9.5.rc3 and in case all tests pass

a patchbot on pascaline can be launched again.  --Samuel

[Frédéric Chapoton]

lrslib doctests in game_theory/parser.py are fixed in #33101 (positive review)

[Samuel Lelievre]

Hi Frédéric,

Thanks for the link! Hope the branch at that ticket gets

merged in the next development release. Tried building

Sage 9.5.rc3 but hit the sagemath_doc_html build failure

reported at ticket #33139.

Are the reports at https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/0/

only visible until the next development release comes out?

Or is there a way to refer to them that persists a bit longer?

Thanks for maintaining sage-patchbot!   --Samuel

2022-01-21 20:55:36 UTC, Frédéric Chapoton:

[Dima Pasechnik]

On Fri, 21 Jan 2022, 11:16 Dima Pasechnik, <dim...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 9:43 AM 'jonatha...@googlemail.com' via
sage-devel <sage-...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Frédéric,
>
> due to https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33027 I have given up on running my patchbot.

I've made this ticket a blocker.

Everyone who has an idea about sage-cleaner, please have a look.
Naturally, pexpect interface (to maxima) is involved.

we have a fix there now, please test.

[Frédéric Chapoton]

you can use the base argument in the https adress

https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/0/?base=9.5.rc1

But sometimes I clean old reports, keeping only very recent ones

[Samuel Lelievre]

2022-01-24 12:54:04 UTC, Frédéric Chapoton:

you can use the base argument in the https adress

https://patchbot.sagemath.org/ticket/0/?base=9.5.rc1

But sometimes I clean old reports, keeping only very recent ones

Thanks for the tip. Cleaning up once in a while makes sense

and I was not dreaming of everlasting links, merely hoping

for access to reports for a few weeks to a couple of months.

Seems that is the case. Thank you for the maintenance!  --Samuel

[Samuel Lelievre]

Restarting my "pascaline patchbot" depends on

- https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33101

- https://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/33248

As a workaround, I can imagine creating fake lrslib

and mathematica executables, placed in my PATH,

that can quickly fail Sage's feature detection for lrslib

and mathematica, so that my patchbot can skip all

doctests marked "# optional - lrslib / mathematica"

and resume its role of testing tickets.

Any ideas on a way to do that?