Tanya Voytus
unread,Oct 13, 2011, 9:35:23 PM10/13/11Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Sage Day Philosophy
I think this answer is different for everyone - and only YOU know how
YOU consider your choices. Some people have a strict moral code, and
when they step outside of those bounds, feel "guilty" or as if they've
made the wrong choice. Others, "feel" good after completing actions
that are against the standard moral code (e.g., the rush someone gets
from shoplifting).
Personally, I feel as though if you want to place value terms on your
actions, i.e., decide whether they are "right" or "wrong", "good" or
"bad", then emotion should not be as much as a factor as logic or
reason. Many moral theorists that we will discuss later on in the year
approach morality very logically, and have created ethical systems to
determine the rightness of an action. For example, Kant's basic moral
theory is that you should look at your action and decide whether or
not the world would be a good place if everyone did the same action
you did. However, I instinctually feel from experience that people's
lives are too varied to place such a black and white maxim on. Either
way, though, individual emotions are even more varied than that, so to
try and analyze an action through them could get messy.