You could throw Xamarian studio into the mix. /o\
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:45:49AM -0700, Steven Holmes wrote:
> Very cool! Well unless the core members changes dramatically we will
> continue to be fairly JVM focused. But we all use or have used Ruby,
> JavaScript, etc. And I would love to hear more about the Go language.
> Haskell is another I'd love to know more about. Even if you aren't
> using Ruby specifically you might be using Ruby tools like SASS.
> There is a new Groovy tool called Grain for static website generation.
> It has dependencies on Ruby and Python. So it might be a cool one to
> talk about soon. We could look into using it for our NEW WEBSITE.
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Tom Parker <[1]
tpar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Yeah, the name Groovy is too limited for what we actually cover. I was
> going to bring up that we should really push the alternative JVM
> language, but polyglot is just as well. With my stake being in Java,
> I'd favor JVM languages, but would mind if it was broader.
> And I am interested in a a couple talks. The first one would be about
> web frameworks in Immutant(Clojure) and/or Yesod(Haskell). Also
> WebMachine looks very interesting. I am just looking into them and have
> to get up to speed on both the framework and language enough to do a
> simple intro to them.
> Tom
>
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 9:36 AM, Ed Gibbs <[2]
edward...@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> +1 for me
> On Mar 13, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Steve <[3]
iamstev...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Gents!
> I spoke with David yesterday and he had an interesting idea. As we are
> all working on different languages and different platforms, some that
> run on the JVM and some that don't, might it make more sense to broaden
> our group to be a polyglot language and platforms group? This would
> open up the possibility of doing talks on just about anything, but
> including platforms like Ruby, JavaScript, Go, C++ (that's for you
> Brian). We've also morphed a bit as a group over the last 5 years
> where many of our members have broadened their use of different
> languages and tools as we've aged and gained experience. Although this
> clearly includes Alternative JVM languages it obviously includes
> languages not on the JVM as well.
> And just imagine the Acronym? SacPP? Who doesn't love that? Well we
> might need to work on that a bit...
> Let me know what you think. We can discuss it on here and at the next
> meeting.
> -Steve
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "SacGRU" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [4]
sacgru+un...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to [5]
sac...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at [6]
http://groups.google.com/group/sacgru.
> For more options, visit [7]
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "SacGRU" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [8]
sacgru+un...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to [9]
sac...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at [10]
http://groups.google.com/group/sacgru.
> For more options, visit [11]
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "SacGRU" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [12]
sacgru+un...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to [13]
sac...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at [14]
http://groups.google.com/group/sacgru.
> For more options, visit [15]
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> Steve Holmes
> "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a
> fool than to open it and remove all doubt."
> -Mark Twain (or maybe Abraham Lincoln, I've heard both)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "SacGRU" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to [16]
sacgru+un...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to [17]
sac...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at [18]
http://groups.google.com/group/sacgru.
> For more options, visit [19]
https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:
tpar...@gmail.com
> 2. mailto:
edward...@yahoo.com
> 3. mailto:
iamstev...@gmail.com
> 4. mailto:
sacgru+un...@googlegroups.com
> 5. mailto:
sac...@googlegroups.com
> 6.
http://groups.google.com/group/sacgru
> 7.
https://groups.google.com/d/optout
> 8. mailto:
sacgru+un...@googlegroups.com
> 9. mailto:
sac...@googlegroups.com
> 10.
http://groups.google.com/group/sacgru
> 11.
https://groups.google.com/d/optout
> 12. mailto:
sacgru+un...@googlegroups.com
> 13. mailto:
sac...@googlegroups.com
> 14.
http://groups.google.com/group/sacgru
> 15.
https://groups.google.com/d/optout
> 16. mailto:
sacgru+un...@googlegroups.com
> 17. mailto:
sac...@googlegroups.com
> 18.
http://groups.google.com/group/sacgru
> 19.
https://groups.google.com/d/optout
--
Brian Lavender
http://www.brie.com/brian/
"There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to
make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other
way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies."
Professor C. A. R. Hoare
The 1980 Turing award lecture