This seems reasonable. Probably only mkfs.s3ql should do the regexp
check, while mount.s3ql should try to work with whatever it gets. Could
you file this as a bug report?
Thanks!
-Nikolaus
--
�Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.�
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
On second thought: you are aware that S3QL only works with buckets that
have been initialized with mkfs.s3ql, right? You will *not* be able to
access any data that you put into the bucket without using S3QL.
In other words: S3QL stores its data in S3 buckets, but it is not a
general interface to S3 that would allow you to work with any data that
happens to be in a bucket.
Best,
On 10/16/2010 10:23 PM, Ben Hutchison wrote:
> I have several existing S3 buckets with alot of data inside whose
> names have_underscores_in_them. This was previously allowed by amazon,
> and while it now seem "deprecated", as renaming buckets isnt
> supported, I am stuck with those names.On second thought: you are aware that S3QL only works with buckets that
have been initialized with mkfs.s3ql, right? You will *not* be able to
access any data that you put into the bucket without using S3QL.In other words: S3QL stores its data in S3 buckets, but it is not a
general interface to S3 that would allow you to work with any data that
happens to be in a bucket.
Best,-Nikolaus
--
�Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.�