Issue 450 in s3fs: Support for seperate fmask and dmask

[s3...@googlecode.com]

Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Support Priority-Medium

New issue 450 by david.q....@gmail.com: Support for seperate fmask and dmask
https://code.google.com/p/s3fs/issues/detail?id=450

Would it be possible to support the splitting of umask into a separate
dmask and fmask, dmask for directories and fmask for files? I would like to
have directories with the execute bit and files without it.

Cheers,
Dave

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings