Issue 444 in s3fs: Performance problem

45 views
Skip to first unread message

s3...@googlecode.com

unread,
Oct 18, 2014, 7:03:24 AM10/18/14
to s3fs-...@googlegroups.com
Status: New
Owner: ----
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium

New issue 444 by rai...@lisim.com: Performance problem
https://code.google.com/p/s3fs/issues/detail?id=444

I installed s3fs 1.74 on a ubuntu 14.04 (amazon ec2) can mount it and
worked fine. I installed s3cmd 1.1.0 worked fine.

Now I copy a file via cp a b (s3fs) and s3cmd get s3://xxx/ .

and the copy never comes back and the get runs at 25MB/s the file I use
for the test has 75M.

The only point I can se is the fstab entry:

s3fs#xxxx /aws fuse
retries=5,use_cache=/mnt,default_acl=public-read-write,allow_other,_netdev,nosuid,nodev,url=http://s3.amazonaws.com
0 0

Any idea what I make wrong ....





===================================================================
The following information is very important in order to help us to help
you. Omission of the following details may delay your support request or
receive no attention at all.
===================================================================
Version of s3fs being used (s3fs --version):

Version of fuse being used (pkg-config --modversion fuse):

System information (uname -a):

Distro (cat /etc/issue):

s3fs command line used (if applicable):

/etc/fstab entry (if applicable):

s3fs syslog messages (grep s3fs /var/log/syslog):



--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings

s3...@googlecode.com

unread,
Oct 21, 2014, 11:34:10 AM10/21/14
to s3fs-...@googlegroups.com

Comment #1 on issue 444 by ggta...@gmail.com: Performance problem
https://code.google.com/p/s3fs/issues/detail?id=444

Hi, Rainer

I think about possibility for this problem.
One of it, "use_cache=/mnt" should be change to "/tmp" etc, because /mnt is
usually mount point.

Please try to it, and if you can, start to try to run s3fs with minimum
parameters.

Regards,

s3...@googlecode.com

unread,
Feb 7, 2015, 10:38:26 AM2/7/15
to s3fs-...@googlegroups.com
Updates:
Status: Done

Comment #2 on issue 444 by ggta...@gmail.com: Performance problem
https://code.google.com/p/s3fs/issues/detail?id=444

Hi

I'm going to close this issue.
If you have been had this issue yet, please post new issue on
Github(https://github.com/s3fs-fuse/s3fs-fuse).
We moved s3fs project to Github, and please use latest version.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages