How significant is the "S3 key names prefix similarities bottleneck" to 's3backer'?
This issue would apply to 's3backer' since its object names are hex block id's,
sequentially going from '00000000' on up:
Request Rate and Performance Considerations - Amazon Simple Storage Service
latency on S3 operations depends on key names since prefix similarities become a bottleneck
https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/dev/request-rate-perf-considerations.html I was thinking on making a change locally that would suppress the leading zeros,
which should help the hashing, but would lose the sorted order.
Of course, that change would not be backward compatible with any existing
's3backer' virtual disks.
Does this seem worth the effort?
~ Jeff Byers ~