Few Points to Discuss within
Ankur Agarwal
1. Demand Dates: The demand dates for each tower should be same.
In case there is Difference in demand dates for same tower than the one which is later should be considered for calculating the Interest.
2. Payment Dates: The earlier of the receipt or the payment realised in Paramount’s account to be considered.
3. No Service Tax difference should be paid for the amount now shown as other charges. If that is done than the banks should issue some notice to the builder citing a case of cheating as previously it was shown that the amount is all inclusive & now they are refracting it with other charges & flat cost as banks do not give finance on other charges.
4. How can service tax be levied from Retrospective date?
5. What about if the payment was made in any case before the demand date? Will the same interest be paid to the customer who has made the payment?
6. For all those who’ve made the payment after these letters were issued, there payments should be rectified as per the new clauses.
7. Why the interest was not shown/ asked by the builder in the respective demand letter raised by the builder so that they could have been cleared during the same payments.
------------------
Ankur Agarwal
P Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail
Ankur Agarwal
The clause stands correct for the payments from now on & can’t b applied with retrospective basis.
------------------
Ankur Agarwal
P Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail
From: Sarabjit Jagirdar [mailto:sjagirdar=yaho...@commonfloor.com] On Behalf Of Sarabjit Jagirdar
Sent: 10 December 2012 14:27
To: paramount-...@commonfloor.com
Subject: Re:[Paramount Floraville]Few Points to Discuss within
I rememeber reading a clause that all govt levies to be borne by the allotee. Earlier we were paying a service tax of 3% and now it is going to be 10.33% |
|
1. Demand Dates: The demand dates for each tower should be same. In case there is Difference in demand dates for same tower than the one which is later should be considered for calculating the Interest. |
2. Payment Dates: The earlier of the receipt or the payment realised in Paramount’s account to be considered. |
3. No Service Tax difference should be paid for the amount now shown as other charges. If that is done than the banks should issue some notice to the builder citing a case of cheating as previously it was shown that the amount is all inclusive & now they are refracting it with other charges & flat cost as banks do not give finance on other charges. 4. How can service tax be levied from Retrospective date? 5. What about if the payment was made in any case before the demand date? Will the same interest be paid to the customer who has made the payment? |
6. For all those who’ve made the payment after these letters were issued, there payments should be rectified as per the new clauses. |
7. Why the interest was not shown/ asked by the builder in the respective demand letter raised by the builder so that they could have been cleared during the same payments.
------------------ Ankur Agarwal
P Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail
|
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.2805 / Virus Database: 2634/5948 - Release Date: 12/09/12