mpapis,
On 2012-06-05 05:00, mpapis wrote:
> RVM was not intended to be used with system rubies, the `rvm system`
> options was more as a fallback to not use.
Right.
> To manage rubies via rvm (rvm 1.x) you need to install those rubies
> with it!
Of course.
> There is experimental option to allow it `rvm mount /path/to/ruby [-n
> <name>]` or `rvm automount` to detect all rubies on `$PATH`.
>
> The problem with system installed rubies is they have they own
> compilation options that might and most likely will make troubles
> when
> used in RVM - at least from my experience.
It was a while ago that I looked at the system install but I remember I
had a lot of troubles too and eventually gave up . .
> Why is it a problem for you to install rubies with RVM?
No problems at all as a user - only for the system.
> Have you considered mixed mode RVM where RVM + rubies are installed
> in
> system and gemsets are created per user.
How would that help what I want to do?
Doesn't seem to help. Passenger v3.2 is supposed to be able to support
multiple Rubies - I have sent Phusion a note about paid support for
using the pre-release version.