Mailer:
Corresponding view:
Can anyone give me some assistance with this or point me to some
relevant documentation?
Note: the attachment could be in almost any format but is likely to be a
.doc or .pdf file.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Can anyone help me with this? It is still giving me issues. The updated
pasties are in the quote above.
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 5:34 AM, Pale Horse <li...@ruby-forum.com> wrote:
> Pale Horse wrote:
>>
>> What I want, and can't seem to achieve, is to send an html email with an
>> attachment. As it stands, I can do one or the other and aren't sure how
>> to get both to work.
http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionMailer/Base.html
I suspect the answer to your problem lies in the last sentence of the
'Multipart Emails' section which says:
"Implicit template rendering is not performed if any attachments or
parts have been added to the email. This means that you’ll have to
manually add each part to the email and set the content type of the
email to multipart/alternative."
The latter portion of the 'Mailer Models' section addresses explicit
template rendering. Googling 'rails mailer explicit template
rendering' offered up some links that look helpful. There's one by
Eric Hodel that looked like it might point the way.
HTH,
Bill
Thank you for your replies, both of you. It is true that I need to split
the email into different parts but the syntax is losing me.
What I want, and can't seem to achieve, is to send an html email with anattachment. As it stands, I can do one or the other and aren't sure howto get both to work.I think you're screwing thinks up by forcing the content type to text/html - an email with attachments is going to be multipart. Might bedifferent in 3, but in 2.3 there's a part method that allows you tospecify each of the parts (plain, html, attachments etc.)Fred
Thank you for your replies, both of you. It is true that I need to split
the email into different parts but the syntax is losing me.
Best regards
Peter De Berdt
Those links helped me out and solved my problem; I just needed the
syntax. The logic wasn't a problem so that cleared it up for me - thank
you.