redirect_to :back - Any way to go back two pages?

96 views
Skip to first unread message

Don

unread,
Jan 23, 2012, 12:46:13 AM1/23/12
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com

I've run in to a strange situation where it would be great if there were a way to use " redirect_to :back " to skip back over the previous page and go to the previous, previous page ( :back X 2.)  Any one have any ideas how to do this?  I think I might end up trying to use the session some how, but want to avoid implementing my own system if possible.

Thanks!

Magesh

unread,
Jan 23, 2012, 4:51:03 AM1/23/12
to Ruby on Rails: Talk


On Jan 23, 12:46 am, Don <don.leat...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've run in to a strange situation where it would be great if there were a
> way to use " redirect_to :back " to skip back over the previous page and go
> to the previous, previous page ( :back X 2.)  Any one have any ideas how to
> do this?

The best thing that you can do is store the link where you want the
application to redirect_to in a later stage
and use it with the redirect_to syntax

eg:
session[:return_to] = request.fullpath (use this inside the controller
action where you would like to redirect to)
and then use
redirect_to session[:return_to]

Andreas Arnold

unread,
Jan 23, 2012, 4:54:39 AM1/23/12
to Ruby on Rails: Talk
If you don't mind to use Javascript for it, you could use
window.history.go(-2) (More on that here:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/DOM/Manipulating_the_browser_history#Moving_to_a_specific_point_in_history)

On Jan 23, 12:46 am, Don <don.leat...@gmail.com> wrote:

Dave Aronson

unread,
Jan 23, 2012, 7:14:12 AM1/23/12
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com

How are you currently paginating? Some of the existing pagination
gems might (I haven't looked) have features to provide individual
links to the next and previous *few* pages, maybe even adjustable.
For instance, if you're on page 7 out of 24, it might provide not only
arrows to 6 and 8, but numeric links to 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10 (and
possibly arrow and/or numeric links to 1 and 24).

-Dave

--
Dave Aronson, Available Cleared Ruby on Rails Freelancer
(NoVa/DC/Remote); details @ http://www.DaveAronson.com/.

Don

unread,
Jan 24, 2012, 5:11:50 PM1/24/12
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
I was trying to avoid this approach as I expected it would be a little complex, but your code shows that it is pretty straightforward.  Thanks for taking the time to write it out.  

Don

unread,
Jan 24, 2012, 5:13:09 PM1/24/12
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for the idea.  Unfortunately the :back :back process that I need to do is back to a previous model in a different view, so pagination won't do it for me.

Don

unread,
Jan 24, 2012, 5:14:49 PM1/24/12
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
Cool!  Had not thought of this approach at all.  I have very weak JS skills, but I'll look into this.

Peter Vandenabeele

unread,
Jan 24, 2012, 6:14:33 PM1/24/12
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:14 PM, Don <don.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
Cool!  Had not thought of this approach at all.  I have very weak JS skills, but I'll look into this.

Hi Don.

FYI, Attached is a screen shot of how I see your 3 recent mails in Gmail. To me they
seem like 3 short messages without context. I think you could get more help/feedback
if you leave a little context quoted above, showing to what you are actually responding.

I double checked in the original message text (as presented to me by Gmail) and that
seems to confirm that there is not real quoted context.

No big problem, it's just that you might get more/better feedback with proper quoting
a context.

Hope This Helps,

Peter
Don.png

Dave Aronson

unread,
Jan 24, 2012, 6:27:56 PM1/24/12
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 18:14, Peter Vandenabeele
<pe...@vandenabeele.com> wrote:

> I think you could get more help/feedback if you leave a little context
> quoted above, showing to what you are actually responding.

Just don't dare top-post, without nomex on. ;-)

Peter Vandenabeele

unread,
Jan 25, 2012, 3:59:59 AM1/25/12
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Dave Aronson <googlegr...@davearonson.com> wrote:
Just don't dare top-post, without nomex on.  ;-)

Dave, thanks for the hint :-)

Don, sorry for being pedantic.

Peter

Don

unread,
Jan 25, 2012, 2:13:31 PM1/25/12
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com, pe...@vandenabeele.com

 
FYI, Attached is a screen shot of how I see your 3 recent mails in Gmail. To me they
seem like 3 short messages without context. I think you could get more help/feedback
if you leave a little context quoted above, showing to what you are actually responding.


Thanks Peter.  Appreciate the feedback. 

Tim Shaffer

unread,
Jan 25, 2012, 3:02:06 PM1/25/12
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
If you can do it in JavaScript, you can always just do window.history.go(-2)
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages