mikel mail with gmail stmp, security issue

70 views
Skip to first unread message

Whil Piavis

unread,
Mar 4, 2016, 1:57:25 AM3/4/16
to Ruby on Rails: Talk
Greetings, 
 
  I'm trying to get the mikel mail gem working with stmp to gmail.  When I attempt to send a mail I get the 'check_auth_response' error.  (NET::SMTPAuthenticationError).

  When I go to gmail it then says that there has been an attempt to sign in from an app that does not meet modern security standards.

  Is it possible to have the mikel mail gem meet these security standards?

  Is it better just to make an smtp server on my local machine if this is only going to be used for sending mails?  If so are there any easy suggestions?

Thanks!

tamouse pontiki

unread,
Mar 4, 2016, 2:49:04 AM3/4/16
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Whil Piavis <ncsupira...@gmail.com> wrote:
Greetings, 
 
  I'm trying to get the mikel mail gem working with stmp to gmail.  When I attempt to send a mail I get the 'check_auth_response' error.  (NET::SMTPAuthenticationError).

  When I go to gmail it then says that there has been an attempt to sign in from an app that does not meet modern security standards.

  Is it possible to have the mikel mail gem meet these security standards?

This is just a guess, but do you need an application password to use with your gmail account?

 

  Is it better just to make an smtp server on my local machine if this is only going to be used for sending mails?  If so are there any easy suggestions?

Thanks!

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-ta...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rubyonrails-talk/bffa7596-a0bc-4b9e-9edd-1470b5912ff5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages