def bookif params[:date].present? && params[:room].present? && current_userroom = Room.find_by_id(params[:room])date = DateTime.strptime(params[:date],"%d-%m-%Y-%H-%M")unless date > Date.today+8.days || date.past?unless Book.user(current_user.id).room(room.id).period(room.period).firstunless Book.room(room.id).free(date,date+room.duration.minutes).firststop = (date+room.duration.minutes).strftime("%H:%M") == "00:00" ? "23:59" : (date+room.duration.minutes).strftime("%H:%M")unless Book.room(room.id).cyclic.dayoftheweek(date.wday).onlytimefree(date.strftime("%H:%M"),stop).firstredirect_to list_books_path(:room=>room)elseflash[:error] = "Obiekt #{room.name} is reserved each week"endelseflash[:error] = "Obiekt #{room.name} is not availible"endelseflash[:error] = "Obiekt #{room.name} can be reserved once on few days"endelseflash[:error] = "wrong date"endelseflash[:error] = "no raservation parameters"endend
> How to refactor its right way?
Without delving too deep into the actual logic....
You've got a bunch of "unless this else that". Generally speaking, if
you're using an "else", using "unless" makes it much more difficult
for a reader to follow, because of the multiple negations. With an
"else", stick to "if".
Other than that, I'd suggest organizing it along the lines of:
if some error condition
complain about this one
elsif another error condition
complain about that one
elsif some other error condition
complain about the other one
# lather, rinse, repeat
else # all is happy!
do what the user was trying to do
end
Now, within the "do what the user was trying to do", you may wind up
finally being able to calculate or retrieve some things you need to
analyze further error conditions. There are several approaches. You
can just nest these again, within reason, or make the happy path a
method call, wherein you repeat that pattern.
-Dave
--
Dave Aronson: Available Cleared Ruby on Rails Freelancer
(NoVa/DC/Remote) -- see www.DaveAronson.com, and blogs at
www.Codosaur.us, www.Dare2XL.com, www.RecruitingRants.com
--You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.To post to this group, send email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com.To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-ta...@googlegroups.com.For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
> You should move most conditions to validations. That IMHO is the best way to
> refactor this.
D'oh, you're right, I totally glossed over that it was in his
*controller*! Yeah, this is a canonical time when the Zen master
should whack the student upside the head, and remind him of the
mantra, "skinny controller, fat model".... ;-)