mongrel stand alone for small site

2 views
Skip to first unread message

MJFuzz

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 3:38:00 PM11/24/09
to Ruby on Rails: Talk
Hello,

I just completed my first rails app. I'm currently signed up at
HostGator with a shared account. I noticed that they run their rails
apps with just the mongrel (non Apache load balanced/clustered)
server. I've read some mixed information about mongrel. Some say its
ok by itself, some say no. For a small site with maybe 500-1000 hits a
month, will the mongrel service by itself handle that? Obviously if
the site grows, I can move to something more robust. But was curious
if this will give me what i need in the interim.

Thoughts?

Niels Meersschaert

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 4:17:35 PM11/24/09
to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com
Mongrel will easily handle that volume. Up until a couple years ago, mongrel was the defacto deployment system for Rails. One thing to keep an eye on with mongrel is memory usage. You might want to restart it periodically to free up some memory.

> --
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-ta...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>

MJFuzz

unread,
Nov 24, 2009, 4:50:50 PM11/24/09
to Ruby on Rails: Talk
Great Thanks!
>  smime.p7s
> 3KViewDownload
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages