Observers or callbacks?

103 views
Skip to first unread message

tekwiz

unread,
Mar 20, 2009, 7:11:57 PM3/20/09
to Ruby on Rails: Talk
Why use an Observer for a single model rather than using a callback in
the ActiveRecord object? They seem like they work identically. Is
there a difference I'm missing?

For example, these seem like they would do the same thing:

class User < ActiveRecord::Base
after_create :send_welcome

protected
def send_welcome
UserMailer.send_welcome(self)
end
end

class UserObserver < ActiveRecord::Observer
def after_create(user)
UserMailer.send_welcome(user)
end
end

-- TW

elioncho

unread,
Mar 20, 2009, 9:15:32 PM3/20/09
to Ruby on Rails: Talk
Hi tekwiz,

This is excerpt is from Agile Web Development with Rails:

Callbacks are a fine technique, but they can sometimes result in a
model class
taking on responsibilities that aren’t really related to the nature of
the model.
For example, on page 385 we created a callback that generated a log
message
when an order was created. That functionality isn’t really part of the
basic
Order class—we put it there because that’s where the callback
executed.
Active Record observers overcome that limitation. An observer
transparently
links itself into a model class, registering itself for callbacks as
if it were part
of the model but without requiring any changes in the model itself.

tekwiz

unread,
Mar 20, 2009, 9:52:55 PM3/20/09
to Ruby on Rails: Talk
Thanks elioncho! I understand that it is a best practice to separate
certain functionality out of models into observers.

I guess I should clarify my question... Is there any _technical_
reason to use observers instead of callbacks or visa versa.

-- TW

zubin

unread,
May 7, 2009, 9:50:41 PM5/7/09
to Ruby on Rails: Talk
I'd really like to know the answer to that too!
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages