I'm particularly interested in
- 2-3-bench
- 2-3-stable
- master
On 2.3s, what's the difference between bench and stable?
What is master for nowadays? Something like 3.0 stable?
I think 3-0-unstable would warrant having a description too, tho it
seems pretty obvious.
The rest seem to be topic branches, right?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-co...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en.
Well, that's interesting, because I was playing with activesupport and
all tests pass on 2-3-bench, but over 50 of them fail with 2-3-stable.
Is 2-3-stable activesupport passing all tests for you? If so branch
this to another thread so we can figure out what's happening here. I
ended up running the tests because mb_chars was not working for me.
(ruby 1.8.7 via macports)
> All 3.0 work is being done on master;
So what's 3-0-unstable there for?
> Hope that helps,
It does, but how about the wiki or any other documentation on it?
Wouldn't it be a good thing to have available for forkers, etc?
CI says they're passing.
They pass for me also, sounds like something a little tougher to track down...
> So what's 3-0-unstable there for?
Legacy stuff where carl and yehuda were experimenting before we 'made
the cut over' and merged the refactoring to master.
> It does, but how about the wiki or any other documentation on it?
> Wouldn't it be a good thing to have available for forkers, etc?
master is the next major release, x-y-stable is for x.y.next.
Anything else is typically short lived and not of interest to people
who aren't actively collaborating on that branch.
Someone could put that on the wiki I guess but there's really not that
much to it.
--
Cheers
Koz