[ruby-core:67962] [ruby-trunk - Bug #10821] [Open] mkmf.rb: Incorrect have_devel? test depending on run order
5 views
Skip to first unread message
jo...@joshpeek.com
Feb 2, 2015, 7:05:19 PM2/2/15
to ruby...@ruby-lang.org
Issue #10821 has been reported by Joshua Peek.
----------------------------------------
Bug #10821: mkmf.rb: Incorrect have_devel? test depending on run order
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10821
* Author: Joshua Peek
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-darwin14.0]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
have_devel? is usually lazily checked on the first call to try_do(). However, try_do() may be invoked within the scope of a with_ldflags or with_cflags block. If have_devel? is checked for the first time with altered test LDFLAGS or CFLAGS it may crash.
~~~
# extconf.rb
$LDFLAGS = "-L/custom/path/to/lib
try_ldflags "-Issl"
# try_ldflags -> try_link -> try_do -> have_devel (with incorrect $LDFLAG in scope)
~~~
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
----------------------------------------
Bug #10821: mkmf.rb: Incorrect have_devel? test depending on run order
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10821
* Author: Joshua Peek
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-darwin14.0]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
have_devel? is usually lazily checked on the first call to try_do(). However, try_do() may be invoked within the scope of a with_ldflags or with_cflags block. If have_devel? is checked for the first time with altered test LDFLAGS or CFLAGS it may crash.
~~~
# extconf.rb
$LDFLAGS = "-L/custom/path/to/lib
try_ldflags "-Issl"
# try_ldflags -> try_link -> try_do -> have_devel (with incorrect $LDFLAG in scope)
~~~
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
ru...@tmm1.net
Feb 3, 2015, 5:01:50 PM2/3/15
to ruby...@ruby-lang.org
Issue #10821 has been updated by Aman Gupta.
Backport changed from 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN to 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
Bug #10821: mkmf.rb: Incorrect have_devel? test depending on run order
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10821#change-51372
* Author: Joshua Peek
* Status: Closed
Backport changed from 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: UNKNOWN, 2.2: UNKNOWN to 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: REQUIRED
----------------------------------------
Bug #10821: mkmf.rb: Incorrect have_devel? test depending on run order
* Author: Joshua Peek
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-darwin14.0]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: REQUIRED
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-darwin14.0]
nar...@airemix.jp
Feb 13, 2015, 12:01:02 AM2/13/15
to ruby...@ruby-lang.org
Issue #10821 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
Backport changed from 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: REQUIRED to 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: DONE
ruby_2_2 r49581 merged revision(s) 49482,49487.
----------------------------------------
Bug #10821: mkmf.rb: Incorrect have_devel? test depending on run order
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10821#change-51485
* Author: Joshua Peek
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-darwin14.0]
* Backport: 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: DONE
Backport changed from 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: REQUIRED to 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: DONE
ruby_2_2 r49581 merged revision(s) 49482,49487.
----------------------------------------
Bug #10821: mkmf.rb: Incorrect have_devel? test depending on run order
* Author: Joshua Peek
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-darwin14.0]
u...@garbagecollect.jp
Feb 13, 2015, 8:05:46 AM2/13/15
to ruby...@ruby-lang.org
Issue #10821 has been updated by Usaku NAKAMURA.
Backport changed from 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: DONE to 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: DONE
----------------------------------------
* Author: Joshua Peek
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-darwin14.0]
* Backport: 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: DONE
Backport changed from 2.0.0: UNKNOWN, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: DONE to 2.0.0: REQUIRED, 2.1: REQUIRED, 2.2: DONE
----------------------------------------
Bug #10821: mkmf.rb: Incorrect have_devel? test depending on run order
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/10821#change-51490
* Author: Joshua Peek
* Status: Closed
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.1.2p95 (2014-05-08 revision 45877) [x86_64-darwin14.0]
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages