ludicrous

[rogerdpack]

I think it would be interesting to include ludicrous in benchmarks, if
anybody's up to it.
http://rubystuff.org/ludicrous/
It's strategy is similar to macruby's--would be interesting to see the
difference.

[M. Edward (Ed) Borasky]

I don't have a 32-bit environment to test on, and it doesn't work on
64-bit ones yet. :(
> >
>



--
M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
http://www.linkedin.com/in/edborasky

I've never met a happy clam. In fact, most of them were pretty steamed.

[rogerdpack]

just saw this, too
http://www.infoq.com/news/2009/05/crosstwine-ruby-python
wonder if that would be benchmarkable :)
-=r

On May 4, 1:11 pm, rogerdpack <rogerpack2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it would be interesting to include ludicrous in benchmarks, if

> anybody's up to it.http://rubystuff.org/ludicrous/

[M. Edward (Ed) Borasky]

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:28 PM, rogerdpack <rogerp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> just saw this, too
> http://www.infoq.com/news/2009/05/crosstwine-ruby-python
> wonder if that would be benchmarkable :)

It's closed source and 32 bit. That makes it totally uninteresting to
me. I would be interested in an open source 64 bit *1.9.1* compatible
implementation. :)

And, of course, how it performs on Rails, because all the other
implementations seem to get bogged down in whatever it is that Rails
does. :)

[Roger Pack]

> And, of course, how it performs on Rails, because all the other
> implementations seem to get bogged down in whatever it is that Rails
> does. :)

No joke somehow rails humbles many otherwise fast ruby implementations :)
-=r

[M. Edward (Ed) Borasky]

Anybody on this list at RailsConf? I think someone has made a "real"
Rails benchmark suite and is presenting it there.

[Monty Williams]

Ed,

What session are you talking about? I didn't notice on on benchmarking. Hope I didn't miss it.

-- Monty

[Evan Phoenix]

The session is question is http://en.oreilly.com/rails2009/public/schedule/detail/8615
. Hasn't happened yet and the scheduling deities have smiled upon me
and not scheduled my talk at the same time. Huzzah!

- Evan

[rogerdpack]

I suppose if someone were interested in benchmarking all possible
optimizers, there's also ruby2cext
should be on par with ludicrous, I guess.
-=r