
Yes, I have pulseview in use and got same result as you. In attachement we can find preamble and sync word. Don't know why pulseview OOK decoder stops decoding and made this gaps afterwards.
The default FM demod ("classic") doesn't do well with GFSK (the smooth FM transitions), better use -Y minmax
This I didn't understood, you mean a command like this:
rtl_433 -s 1000k -r g010_869.84M_1000k.cu8 -R 0 -Y minmax -X "n=Micronet,m=OOK_PCM,s=13,l=13,r=20000,preamble={16}0xaa99"
Doing this I got not the results from pulseview.
But the real problem should be the center frequency, one frequency seems to be at DC. This is shown with -A as
Frequency offsets [F1, F2]: -1327, 0 (-20.2 kHz, +0.0 kHz) -- i.e. just one freq seen, at 20k below center. Try to shift by say 50k.
Yes I got same analyzing result.
Detected OOK package @0.032311s
Analyzing pulses...
Total count: 3, width: 13.48 ms (13476 S)
Pulse width distribution:
[ 0] count: 1, width: 12 us [12;12] ( 12 S)
[ 1] count: 1, width: 4564 us [4564;4564] (4564 S)
[ 2] count: 1, width: 6890 us [6890;6890] (6890 S)
Gap width distribution:
[ 0] count: 1, width: 22 us [22;22] ( 22 S)
[ 1] count: 1, width: 1988 us [1988;1988] (1988 S)
Pulse period distribution:
[ 0] count: 1, width: 34 us [34;34] ( 34 S)
[ 1] count: 1, width: 6552 us [6552;6552] (6552 S)
Pulse timing distribution:
[ 0] count: 1, width: 12 us [12;12] ( 12 S)
[ 1] count: 1, width: 4564 us [4564;4564] (4564 S)
[ 2] count: 1, width: 6890 us [6890;6890] (6890 S)
[ 3] count: 1, width: 22 us [22;22] ( 22 S)
[ 4] count: 1, width: 1988 us [1988;1988] (1988 S)
[ 5] count: 1, width: 68901 us [68901;68901] (68901 S)
Level estimates [high, low]: 15960, 3
RSSI: -0.1 dB SNR: 37.3 dB Noise: -37.4 dB
Frequency offsets [F1, F2]: -1326, 0 (-20.2 kHz, +0.0
kHz)
Guessing modulation: Pulse Width Modulation with sync/delimiter
view at
https://triq.org/pdv/#AAB106000C11D41AEA001607C40D258394A555
Attempting demodulation... short_width: 4564, long_width: 6890,
reset_limit: 1989, sync_width: 12
Use a flex decoder with -X
'n=name,m=OOK_PWM,s=4564,l=6890,r=1989,g=0,t=0,y=12'
But because the pulse recognition is Nonsens I don't trust the
frequency values. I will try with lower center frequency.
Could also be that the deviation is too small or the symbol rate to high for 1M sample rate, try 2M perhaps.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "rtl_433" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rtl_433/EtPPnXyFTAM/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rtl_433+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rtl_433/59a65b77-2f2e-4d34-a98f-f79bd3e32e12n%40googlegroups.com.
Thanks for the explanations.
The frequency value is not dependent on the pulse decoding, it's just the instantaneous phase rate (phase angle diff between samples). If no second freq (F2) is found the FSK demod is not activated.
I made an spectrogram of the cu8 file (attached) and see something like +/-30kHz.
With that and the results of the shown pulseview I am still confused about the analyzing results of rtl_433. But I will make at next few measurements with different center frequencies.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "rtl_433" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rtl_433/EtPPnXyFTAM/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to rtl_433+u...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rtl_433/7e29737a-9664-43ef-b7b8-cb5e855103d8n%40googlegroups.com.