Bhaskar Prabhu
unread,Nov 23, 2017, 11:15:24 PM11/23/17Sign in to reply to author
Sign in to forward
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to shailesh gandhi, rtitr...@googlegroups.com, vivek velankar, vijay kumbhar, Vinita Vishwas Deshmukh, prabhuisbhaskar, rti4emp...@googlegroups.com, Sudhir Jatar, Vihar Durve, vihar...@gmail.com, Pralhad Kachare, LOKESH BATRA, Venkatesh Chri, Trilochan Sastry, Jagdeep Chhokar, “C J Karira”, ncpriworki...@googlegroups.com, NCPRI India, Prashant Bhushan, Nikhil Dey, Aruna Roy, Aruna Roy, Sucheta Dalal
Dear Shailesh,
Judiciary has become a more hurdle than the PIOs, 1st AA and ICs but we have also many many RTI advocacy groups and advocators who have taken "gene" of silent spectators at Judiciary as they to gods but bringing new acts without noticing systematic damaging or polluting done to sunshine RTI Act.
There is lot of praise given Amicus Curiae by court who literally manufactured "curry" for the satisfaction of the court these persons never thought of new Bharat that we entered into after enactment of RTI act. It only continuously dealt with on "consistency and inconstancy" as per to their taste buds, if consistency is there as per to court then they should accept to give information in which ever mode "sovereign citizens" feels to apply for information should be provided whether as per to rules of court or as per to rules of RTI....SCR and the other under the RTI Act, BUT THE COURTS are silent of findings of AMICUS CURIAE ON PROCEDURAL IN-CONSISTENCY OF SCR RULES AS AGAINST RTI RULES AMICUS CURIE HAS POINTED OUT.....