RE: Sandoval Tree Svc Corrected estimate!

6 views
Skip to first unread message

Stonehenge Property Management

unread,
Apr 28, 2026, 11:18:00 AMApr 28
to Daryl Smith, rta_...@googlegroups.com

May 4, 2026

 

All cars must be removed from the full rear, and anyone in a garage that is planning on leaving must also be gone.

There will be numerous pieces of large equipment and they cannot move for everyone desiring to exit, and they don’t want to damage any cars.

David

 

From: Daryl Smith [mailto:drsmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 27, 2026 11:34 AM
To: Stonehenge Property Management
Subject: Re: Sandoval Tree Svc Corrected estimate!

 

OK, sounds good......let me know once scheduled so we can notify people to move cars.

Thanks,

Daryl

 

On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 11:30 AM Stonehenge Property Management <Stoneh...@optonline.net> wrote:

Yes, you have the funds now to do the tree removals.

David

 

From: Daryl Smith [mailto:drsmi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 10:42 PM
To: Stonehenge Property Management
Subject: Fwd: Sandoval Tree Svc Corrected estimate!

 

Hi David,

Here is the tree removal and pruning estimate from Sandoval, about 3K less than the one from Skyview.

Let me know if we can proceed prior to the loan approval.

Thanks,


Daryl

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Maira Muratalla <sandovalt...@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 9:31 PM
Subject: Re: Sandoval Tree Svc Corrected estimate!
To: Daryl Smith <drsmi...@gmail.com>

 

Corrected invoice!!!

 

Sorry for the confusion, This is the correct estimate let us know if you have any question.

 


From: Daryl Smith <drsmi...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2026 3:40 PM
To: Maira Muratalla <sandovalt...@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sandoval Tree Svc Corrected estimate!

 

Hi Maira,

This is the wrong estimate/invoice.

 

I am looking for the estimate for Riverside Terrace at 85 Riverside Ave, Stamford, CT 06905.

Thank you.

Daryl Smith

 

On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 1:27 PM Maira Muratalla <sandovalt...@hotmail.com> wrote:

 

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages