Do you think this is “AI”? It seems like conventional Control Theory. Looking at the code they post to GitHub and the specs of their internal computer, it seems very conventional.
I am a little surprised at how tough the structure is. The Unitree humanoid-biped is fragile. I’ve seen photos of it breaking after a simple trip and fall accident. This goes to show just how little “margin” there is in a biped design compared to the quad. The Biped has to be (to quote a famous engineer) “just about ready to break, or it is too heavy”. While the quad can stand the extra structural mass.
Anyway, this is a serious question. What is the best design for one of these? I think the best is a conventional robot controller that is highly parameterized. Then a very lightweight neural network to select the parameters. This is likely the way animals and humans work. Much of our movement is nearly hard-coded and we only “think” about parameters like “how fast” and “what direction” and maybe a half dozen other things. For the most part locomotion, pumping blood and breathing are all on “autopilot” but we do have some control. A hybrid system might be best.
That said, I think the Unitree ‘bot’ is 100% hand coded.