New RSpec formatter
Andrew Hodgkinson
[ 22] Doggo
[ 22] #message
[01/22] logs directly if an example-start occurs unexpectedly
[02/22] logs directly with no example running
[03/22] logs in context if an example is running
[ 22] example groups
[ 22] #example_group_finished
[04/22] does not decrement below zero
[05/22] derements group level
[ 22] #example_group_started
[06/22] does not output a separator below top level
[07/22] outputs an indication of group progress
...etc
[ 10] Doggo examples
[01/10] outer passes
[02/10] FAILED (1) - outer fails
1) Doggo examples outer fails
Failure/Error: expect(true).to eql(false)
expected: false
got: true
(compared using eql?)
Diff:
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-false
+true
# ./spec/example/doggo_spec.rb:29:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
[03/10] PENDING - outer is pending with xit
[04/10] FAILED (2) - outer is pending with a custom message
2) Doggo examples outer is pending with a custom message FIXED
Expected pending 'custom message' to fail. No error was raised.
# ./spec/example/doggo_spec.rb:35
[ 10] in a context
[ 10] with a nested context
[05/10] passes
[06/10] FAILED (3) - fails
3) Doggo examples in a context with a nested context fails
Failure/Error: expect(true).to eql(false)
expected: false
got: true
(compared using eql?)
Diff:
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-false
+true
# ./spec/example/doggo_spec.rb:12:in `block (4 levels) in <top (required)>'
[07/10] PENDING - is pending with xit
[08/10] FAILED (4) - is pending with a custom message
4) Doggo examples in a context with a nested context is pending with a custom message FIXED
Expected pending 'custom message' to fail. No error was raised.
# ./spec/example/doggo_spec.rb:18
[ 10] test count
[09/10] is taken to 9
[10/10] is taken to 10, showing leading zero pad formatting
Malini Gowda
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rspec" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rspec+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rspec/81773a67-34a5-4dfb-95cb-aee9a51f727c%40googlegroups.com.
Andrew Hodgkinson
> Is there any gem which generates parallel report in rspec when
> executed in parallel?
execution and did stick with one for a while, but in the end all the
solutions we tried were unreliable. Ironically, given that the only
reason the gems exist is to support concurrent test execution, none of
them seemed to deal with concurrency properly and suffered various race
conditions or general oversights. Splitting of logged output and things
like incorrect or missing 'rcov' coverage were common problems.
We chose instead to split our test suite in parallel CI runs - currently
we have one executing system specs and another executing everything
else. That has been our least-worst option so far - certainly a lot
easier than trying to remote debug complex timing issues in complex
gems, or try and develop our own gem that might well have been no better
anyway. We do still only get a good RCov report or logging if we run in
series, and local development always has to do so.