Hi
If you check the render license section in RR, then you can see that there is a global „Arnold“ render app/license at position 4.
There should not be any Maya-Arnold in the Render Lic tab in rrConfig.
That was changed a long time ago.
Afaik around the time Arnold was made available for other apps like Houdini.
E.g. your render config file 3D02__Maya2009__Arnold.cfg should contain the line
RendererLicense= /Arnold
If that does not exist, which version is stated in your config file?
And which RR version do you use?
> is it ok to declare our "plugins" names
Example config A:
Name= Maya
rendererName= arnoldCGEV
This would be the two licenses:
/Maya
/Maya/arnoldCGEV
As you can see you have two licenses that RR counts, the main app and the renderer/plugin.
RR checks counts both.
So you can tell RR that you have 100 Maya licenses, but only 50 arnoldCGEV license WITHIN Maya.
Example config B:
Name= Maya
rendererName= arnoldCGEV
RendererLicense= /Arnold
This overrides the renderer license, so this would be the two licenses:
/Maya
/Arnold
Same for Arnold Standalone, please see the file A80__Arnold_StdA_DeNoice.cfg
In rrConfig you can see Denoice as a seperate license count for the main app Arnold.
So you can tell RR that it should start only 10x Denoise jobs although you have 100x Arnold licenses.
PS: If there is a license Arnold/Arnold in rrConfig, that should be a bug.
Use the main Arnold license count only.
regards,
Holger Schönberger
Please use the rrKnights Tavern
or our support system for new questions.
I have just seen by that I got a privat emessage in Google.
Please reply tot he rrKnights tavern instead.
>Hi we are still on old 7.0.34b version (hope to upgrade during august)
Note: You can slightly upgrade a few machines to test it with a new project.
And switch clients and submitters any time between old and new farm by changing a config+ env var or using rrWorkstationInstaller.
>If I understand well i should just put RendererLicense= /Arnold in all configs that require arnold licence
>and just count the total in /Arnold root section in rr config /license?
Yes.
>do you think that syntax was already implemented in 7.0.34 ?
No, I am sorry.