Generic Windows 8.1 Pro Key
Adabella Frierdich
I need to create a container family which is used for visualisation purpose and i need to create doors and windows in it. I can create everything in generic family and create components like doors and windows but i wanted to know can we place windows in it like we do in projects on walls. I read somewhere to create door/window like component in generic family and change family type to window (but i couldnt find how).
Thank you so much. I want a complete container family with windows so option 1 is my choice as i am not gonna do it in project. I am still confused because i created window frame as generic model and changed its family to "window" then loaded it in another family which is also generic and tried to place it there but could not. Should i do something in other generic family where i am gonna place window
if you expect the nested window to behave similar to a hosted window family, you will need to start it using a generic model face based where you would model the opening/cutting void, then either model the Window or nest it and last load and place the face based on to the container
We have a request from one of our support teams for a way for students to send a chat to a generic name - E.G: Student Support, they want anyone in their team depending who is on duty to be able to view and respond to that chat, preferably as the generic name, but they have said it doesn't matter too much if the response comes from an individuals name. It is however important that everyone in the team can access the whole chat, and it doesn't go to an individual person.
I've done some searching and not really come up with anything, my only thought is you could use a generic account that they can all login to Teams as, but generic accounts are a bit of a no no here, so I'd rather not go down that route.
Has anyone else come across anything that might work and is worth investigating for this purpose?
Thanks
the analysis for C2/Generic-C is rather vague. What's in the endpoints' Anti-Virus log (%ProgramData%\Sophos\Sophos Anti-Virus\logs\SAV.txt)? Is indeed the client firewall (SCF) installed, if so please check its log for possible details. See also Dealing with a C2 detection.
Haven't found anything yet. Been a little busy. All I do know is I am very disappointed with Sophos Central and all the problems we are having with it. It does not seem to be working at all on about 40% of our machines (either it's giving so many false positives or just not running)
We are getting the exact same reports as you are across multiple machines all to the URL "sync.header.direct" It just started out of the blue a week or so ago and no matter what I try I cant confirm that it is actually malicious and not a false positive.
indeed there's no further information - the odd thing though is the Threat ID: 0. It shouldn't be zero unless it's a double-generic detection - but then on what observations does it base its assessment. Did you open a ticket with Support?
I am opposed to having a ridiculous amount of generic accounts which are only used to gain access to the network. No network specific access is granted (things like drive or software access) by using these users.
I work for a local municipality that has a library. At the library we have a generic login that the computers auto-login to and then use additional software to lock down the machines, revert them to golden images, and authenticate patrons to allow use. Although these machines are part of the domain (for GPOs and login) they do not have access to any UNC drives while logged in as a non-admin. Maybe something like this will help you in your organization?
Having one generic account and using it is OK as long as you can still manage what network resources it has. Setup a generic account in AD that restricts access to the local computer resources such as command prompt, powershell, etc and grant access only to those network resources that are needed for the purpose. If only certain programs will be used then use group policy to only allow those applications from being executed. Then use a content filter or firewall to limit access to only the internet resources it needs.
Best bet in this case is either Deep Freeze or Reboot Restore Rx Pro. The latter is a bit less (I think when we were quoted RRRX Pro was 45% less) but features wise they are fairly similar. -freeze-alternative/
The Windows 11 generic keys are technically default keys that allows you to install the OS without activation. They don't provide you with a licensed copy, but are great for testing new builds. If Windows 11 refuses to install without a product key, or installs a wrong edition, you can specify the appropriate generic key.
You can test Windows 11 before you deploy it to your organization or home. In this case, you can use a virtual machine such as VirtualBox or Hyper-V. You may find it a bad idea to enter your license product key you are using on the real computer to activate a vritual instanse. It may have a limit on the number of activations.
Additionally, there are also product keys for KMS clients. If your OS is supposed to work with a KMS server, you must install the appropriate product key (GVLK) instead of the retail one. The keys are as follows.
So, once you have installed Windows 11 with a generic product key, you won't be able to activate it. However, you may change your mind and decide to make it fully functional. For that, you will need to replace the installed product key with the one that allows activation, e.g. with your retail key.
Note: If you have upgraded to Windows 11 from Windows 10 or Windows 8 with a digital license linked to your Microsoft Account, the operating system will automatically use a generic key during upgrade. That key will be saved to the Registry. Due to that, the tools like Nirsoft ProduKey and similar product key viewers will only show you that generic key. Obiously, you won't be able to use it for clean install with later activation.
Tip: Winaero Twеaker is essential software for every Windows 10, Windows 8 and Windows 7 user. It allows you to customize the appearance and behavior of the operating system in a flexible way.
Try Winaero Twеaker now!
When we connect a USB camera it does not show up as expected in the XA/XD session - it looks as if we attached a USB stick. However the "drive" it appears as is inaccessible. If we then go to the receivers "device manager" and click "Switch to generic" beside the camera it shows up correctly in the session.
I have looked at "Client USB device optimization rules" as it seemed to do exactly what I needed. However it is only supported on Class 03 devices and the cameras are Class 05 devices. And yes, I did test it anyway and came to the conclusion the documentation was correct - sadly.
I have looked at the 2 articles and they both provide information on how to automatically redirect USB devices. The thing is - the cameras are already being redirected autmatically but are using optimized channel which apparently does not work with these devices. Hence the user have to go to the device manager in receiver and switch it to Generic (as shown in this screenshot: -s5e7f7588c3c4e30b).
I have tried every which way to automatically force specific devices to use Generic instead of Optimized, and as of Receiver 4.9.1000, nothing has changed. So, I'm bumping this thread in case somebody else comes across a way to accomplish this.
After using group policy to force the 2 Generic USB options in the connections tab of the Receiver, I noticed the same thing, that they were still using Optimized mode. I made the following registry changes, reconnected to my VDI desktop and in the devices list in Receiver preferences, the devices show as running in generic mode:
I am trying to have a base Windows Forms form which holds common functionality and controls - but also holds references to a class which requires a type for its methods. Each form will represent a different type, so I thought that I could do something along the lines of this:
The designer could not be shown for this file because none of the classes within it can be designed. The designer inspected the following classes in the file: Foo --- The base class 'WindowsFormsApplication1.Base' could not be loaded. Ensure the assembly has been referenced and that all projects have been built.
When a Windows Form or a user UserControl is loaded in the designer, basically the designer is creating an instance of the base class (that class that your custom form or control directly derives from) and then executes the InitializeComponents() method manually/explicitly through reflection to build up the intended design of your control.
In your case however it can not create an instance of the base class, because it has a generic parameter. The same thing happens if the base class of your form or your control is abstract or does not have a default constructor. In those cases the designer will also not be able to create an instance of your base class.
b37509886e