RHTMLO table form

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Gordon Haverland

unread,
Jul 16, 2011, 7:32:33 PM7/16/11
to rose-htm...@googlegroups.com
Hello.

In what I am doing, it seems useful to produce forms that mimic
the structure of the document. As near as I can tell, this is not
something that RHTMLO was meant to do. And I'm talking HTML (not
CSS or Javascript).

Would you like a document about this once I get things working?
POD?

Gord

John Siracusa

unread,
Jul 16, 2011, 7:37:54 PM7/16/11
to rose-htm...@googlegroups.com
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Gordon Haverland
<ghav...@materialisations.com> wrote:
> In what I am doing, it seems useful to produce forms that mimic
> the structure of the document.  As near as I can tell, this is not
> something that RHTMLO was meant to do.  And I'm talking HTML (not
> CSS or Javascript).

I'm not sure what you mean here.

> Would you like a document about this once I get things working?
> POD?

There's a wiki here that you can contribute to (you just need to send
me your Google account email address, I think).

-John

Gordon Haverland

unread,
Jul 16, 2011, 7:54:00 PM7/16/11
to rose-htm...@googlegroups.com
On July 16, 2011, John Siracusa wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Gordon Haverland
>
> <ghav...@materialisations.com> wrote:
> > In what I am doing, it seems useful to produce forms that
> > mimic the structure of the document. As near as I can tell,
> > this is not something that RHTMLO was meant to do. And I'm
> > talking HTML (not CSS or Javascript).
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here.

I'm a dinosaur that would much rather be doing differential
equations or linear systems in FORTRAN, than trying to write UI in
perl. My intention is to come up with a UI that is pure HTML (no
CSS or Javascript required) for people to work with this data.

HTML does not allow nested forms. I can easily come up with
nested forms using RHTMLO. I've read just about all the POD that
is in the Rose::* modules, and a lot of the code (usually starting
with test cases, or examples if present).

My problems, such as they are, are not about not reading some
specific part of a POD document enough times. I ran into this
back in 1982/83 when I came across a professor teaching operations
research by the book. If you had a question, he would find a
paragraph or two in the course textbook on the question, and he
would read that section of text as the answer.

I think variety in answering questions is useful. I am offering
to produce some extra documentation, which is possibly buggy, as I
don't totally understand RDBO or RHTMLO at this point. I don't
have a gmail address. Because of having Autism, my preference is
to use LaTeX to produce hyperlinked PDFs, but that isn't what
wikis run on. :-)

I hope things are drier where you are living, than here. Too much
flooding in the last week or so.

Gord

John Siracusa

unread,
Jul 16, 2011, 8:00:12 PM7/16/11
to rose-htm...@googlegroups.com
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Gordon Haverland
<ghav...@materialisations.com> wrote:
> I think variety in answering questions is useful.  I am offering
> to produce some extra documentation, which is possibly buggy, as I
> don't totally understand RDBO or RHTMLO at this point.  I don't
> have a gmail address.  Because of having Autism, my preference is
> to use LaTeX to produce hyperlinked PDFs, but that isn't what
> wikis run on.  :-)

Well, whatever documentation you produce, I'd be glad to look at it.
Just email it (or a URL to it) to me or to this mailing list when
you're done.

-John

Gordon Haverland

unread,
Jul 16, 2011, 8:09:24 PM7/16/11
to rose-htm...@googlegroups.com
On July 16, 2011, John Siracusa wrote:

Thank you. I'll try to produce something reasonable in POD.

Have a great day!
Gord

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages