What is the rationale for this? JT
This was with regard to the ubuntu distro - to avoid duplicating effort until there is enough critical mass to justify an edu edition. [DS]
Thanks Daniel, looking at the Enterprise SIG objectives, it looks like exactly what we need. Is it correct to think that our focus can shift to helping determine / influence the list of 3rd party tools that get integrated into the distro? And will Enterprise result in one or more iso images that people can download and install on a bootable flash drive as described here? http://www.ubuntu.com/download/help/create-a-usb-stick-on-windows
Yes, I expect so (re 3rd party tools and images). I have a control colleague watching that sig, but it would be good if one of us did also [DS].
Bootable DVDs tend to be really slow for boot-up and loading of other resources. Also, a USB stick can be created so that it has a bunch of persistent storage space, which will reduce the complexity of integrating the development environment with a student's laptop.
1. Provide instructions for installing the image on a bootable USB key and using it in a lab setting.
2. Provide enhanced ROS tutorial content for educational audiences.
3. Provide ROS based lessons for educational settings and objectives.
4. Provide a curriculum map that aligns ROS lessons (from 3) to STEM or other Common Core educational standards.
Does this direction make sense? I feel like the objectives discussed at ROSCon around the bootable USB are already achieved by Clearpath in their ongoing development of a bootable USB for Turtlebot as described here http://store.clearpathrobotics.com/collections/turtlebot/products/turtlebot-assembled
What thoughts do others have?