--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ROS Drivers Special Interest Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ros-sig-drive...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ros-sig...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ros-sig-drivers/c4a893f4-5e5d-458d-ac21-5a413f7fa761%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
The roboteq and um6 packages will be maintained for the lifespan of the Grizzly product.Unfortunately, I can't make the same commitment for the other two.
+1 So I would vote "yes" for the roboteq and um6.
What about axis-camera? We use it at UTexas, although not much. I have worked on it and could probably take over maintenance if that makes sense. But, I am not especially looking for extra work right now. ;-)What is your sense of that driver? Is it useful? Is the performance in Python good enough? Are there better alternatives? Why are you dropping support?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ROS Drivers Special Interest Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ros-sig-drivers+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ros-sig-drivers@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/ros-sig-drivers/345fb478-9319-4330-b684-83a172a82677%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Hi Alena,The main issue is all the motor control constants hard-coded into the microbasic script:Since you have to compile this to hex using the vendor tool, it's tricky to genericize. But you're obviously welcome to fork the driver and adjust them to your needs (recompiling as required). Alternatively, a version of the hex could be made with sentinel values which get replaced by values passed with rosparam.Mike
On 12 February 2017 at 19:32, Alena Kazakova <alena...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello, I am new to ROS (just finished the tutorials) and I am using a Roboteq BLDC motor controller for an autonomous car project.Could you please provide some guidelines on how to use the driver? I could not find any solution on my own.Please let me know if there are any hints of how to make it more generic for my project.Thank you,Alena
On Friday, November 29, 2013 at 5:18:04 AM UTC+9, Mike Purvis wrote:Hey folks,We've got a pretty solid C++ driver for the Roboteq motor drivers which has been developed for Grizzly:There are some grizzly-isms in it at the moment, but if there's interest in having it on ros-drivers, I can work to make it suitably generic.Other drivers which we'd consider moving if there's interest include:https://github.com/clearpathrobotics/axis_camera (also needs a new maintainer)Mike
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ROS Drivers Special Interest Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ros-sig-drive...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to ros-sig...@googlegroups.com.
Hello, This is Shubham Bidkar.I am currently working on Roboteq's Brushless motor driver SBL1310. I have built a robot on which SBL1310 motor drivers are mounted. I have connected 4 motor drivers on CAN bus,one of them is master node and other are slave nodes. Can I get a detailed document or guidelines regarding using the package for SBL1310 motor driver. Thanking you in Anticipation. |