We have a sheet with a column that allows multiselect of the drop down options. We need to count how many times an item has been selected but HAS only works if they select just the one option and CONTAINS grabs options that happen to appear inside other options. For example: Using CONTAINS(range,"apple") with a list that has apple and Snapple as options will count 13 Snapples and 23 apples even if there are only 10 apples. Using HAS(range,"apple"), if they select Snapple and anything else it won't find it at all.
Here is a Demo sheet that has a drop down list that is locked to preset entries only and allows multi-select. I will share with Bassam and Andree but I'm not sure how to make it public so anyone can look at it.
Since these sheets are on a trial account that will expire in 23 days, I am adding a better screen shot of the solution and why it works. For anyone who really wants to go the expanded columns route, I put the formulas below for the formula pattern where the 'Combined' row is a copy of the selected values from Demo and then moving to the right the columns are named FIRST, SECOND, THIRD, etc. until you have as many columns as there are possible options. As you can see if there are too many options in the drop down list your formulas will get too long for the cell limit, so this is impractical for a column with more than 30 possible selections, even if I somehow figured out how to get the cells in the Demo column without manually copying and pasting them over.
Click on the column you want the number to drop in. Just like 2048, matching two numbers doubles them! Can you reach 2048 without filling the whole grid?\r\n\r\nAs you play, you earn coins that can be used to change the color scheme of the game.\r\n" } } ] } ] Sorry... this game is not playable in your browser.
We have a company in our organization that we purchase items from and drop ship them to customers. Their products are serial number controlled. The issue that we are having is when that product gets returned to us, we process it via RMA and DMR and ship it back to the company. They inspect the product and sometimes resell it.
Ours was a little different because we wanted to continue to manually create serial number records for our pumps that were going to be drop shipped. We needed to do this because we store documents on the serial number record, and for long lead pumps, we needed to attach documentation long before the drop shipment is to occur.
Is this possible either on a graph or to derive it from the series of numbers. Example of what I am talking about. In my series, the biggest downturn is between the 61st number (43.95) and 102nd number (25.70) so the answer I am looking for is 18.25.
I've set Current Page Number markers on my Master pages, and added a drop shadow to the text. When the master is applied to a document page, the Page Number Marker functions properly, but the drop shadow retains the shap of the Marker Character from the master page, and doesn't change to reflect the document page number until I detach the text from the master page.
I am creating a label style speciafically to alignment chainage/station. In our office, the presention should be on "decimal" format (eg 100) and not the "station" format (eg 0+100). And I know (somehow) to set a style for those kind of format on the alignment label style editor. But my question is, how to create a "decimal" format of chainage/station labels that are whole number from the start and body and only having a decimal numbers only at the end of alignment (if the ending alignment is not whole number).
My aim is to have my chainages to be in "DECIMAL" format but no decimal number in chainage which is whole number but having a decimal numbers (2 places specifically) at the end (if is not whole number)
I will be specific to my wishlist in regards with this post. On the Label Style Composer for Station Value, if you guys could enable please the "Drop Decimal for Whole Numbers" if I choose the "Decimal" format. And also, for other type of Labal style. Like on the Alignment labels, I think no need for the decimal numbers for regular interval as most of the time they are whole number. Same issue for profile labels for its X axis, if you are entering an interval of whole number. Decimal numbers are only good for the last station and not in the regular interval.
Abstract. In-situ measurements of liquid cloud and precipitation drop size distributions from aircraft-mounted probes are used to examine the relationship of the width of drop size distributions to cloud drop number. The width of the size distribution is quantified in terms of the parameter k=(rv /re)3, where rv is the volume mean radius and re is the effective radius of the distributions. We find that on small spatial scales (100 m), k is positively correlated with cloud drop number. This correlation is robust across a variety of campaigns using different probe technology. A new parameterization of k versus cloud drop number is developed. This new parameterization of k is used in an algorithm to derive cloud drop number in liquid phase clouds using satellite measurements of cloud optical depth and effective radius from the MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) sensor on Aqua. This algorithm is compared to the standard approach to derive drop number concentration that assumes a fixed value for k. The general tendency of the parameterization is to narrow the distribution of derived number concentration. The new parameterization generally increases the derived number concentration over ocean, where N is low, and decreases it over land, where N is high. Regional biases are as large as 20 % with the magnitude of the bias closely tracking the regional mean number concentration. Interestingly, biases are smallest in regions of frequent stratocumulus cloud cover, which are a regime of significant interest for study of the aerosol indirect effect on clouds.
This study uses in situ observations of droplet size distributions (DSD) and number concentrations (Nd) to investigate the relationship between DSD width (parameterized by the k parameter) and Nd. Generally, a positive k-Nd relationship is found. This relationship is parameterized and applied to Nd retrievals derived from MODIS level-2 cloud products.
I have a prob. that shouldn't be so hard but I just cant find the syntax how to do it. I have a drop down list with dynamic content, that is, its not an array but the contents will change upon what the user is doing with the user form.
Drop down lost contains "Sarah" in A1, "Pete" in A3, "Bob" in A4, "Sarah" in A5.
When the user chooses Pete and push a button I want the number "3". It could be stored in another cell or whatever. Since the contents will change I cannot use an array or a fixed column.
Thank you for your answer pangolin.
However, Im not sure if I could use the Match function since the variables could exist several times. That is; the variable "Lisa" could exist in both cell "C34" and "C48". I need the row number of the Lisa selected by the user in the drop down list, not any "Lisa" in the column. Could you give an code example of how you mean?
In column A I have a numbered list, in column B I have names, in C surnames and D companies. I populate it by checking if the next row in column A is empty, if it is empty the loop stops. The result is as follow:
Since I added the index number in the beginning the list items will be uniqe, then there may be 2 Pete Smith at Ford but their index number will still be different. I dont know if there is an easier way of doing this but at least this way works.
Six bottles of each glaucoma medication were tested: three each in the vertical and horizontal orientations. Bottles were housed in a customized force gauge apparatus designed to mimic ballpoint fingertip contact with a bottle. At a standard rate, all drops were expressed from each bottle and counted with an automated drop counter. Simultaneously, bottle volume was measured and drop size and number were also estimated. The main outcome measures were: total number of drops, volume per bottle and drops per milliliter (mL) of glaucoma medication.
A total of 192 bottles from 32 bottle designs and manufacturers were tested. Twenty-two of the 32 bottle designs had a significantly different mean number of drops in the vertical and horizontal positions, with 10 designs have more drops dispensed in the horizontal orientation and 12 in the vertical orientation. Six of the 32 bottle designs had a significantly different mean total bottle volume in the vertical and horizontal positions, with all designs having greater volume in the vertical position. An adjusted ratio of mean number of drops/mean bottle volume demonstrated a range from 20.9 drops/mL to 40.8 drops/mL.
There is significant variability in drops and volume available per bottle of glaucoma medication depending on both the bottle position and manufacturer. These data point to the need for circumspection in prescribing glaucoma medications and caution in evaluating therapeutic outcomes.
Despite the importance of bottle design in proper use of topical therapeutics, there exists no standardization of manufacture in regards to drop instillation dynamics [14], and the only dosing requirement is to accurately label and package medication volume [15]. Being manufactured and sold on the basis of volume, eyedrops are distinct from most other forms of pharmacotherapy, which are prescribed with a discrete number of doses to guide dispensing and refill rates. While the minimum volume of medication consumers should anticipate per container of medication is available, this does not necessarily translate to number of applications, and without regulation, leads to the possibility of inconsistency in the number of drops of medicine available per bottle. Several previous studies evaluating a smaller number of medications in a non-standardized fashion have found significant variability in the number of drops between both brands of medication and position of the bottle [16,17,18]. As such, the current study was designed to further evaluate this possibility by objectively and systematically measuring the number of eyedrops in each bottle of many common glaucoma medications.
760c119bf3