rocks7-beta

Since 7 is out, beta discussion seems superfluous -- until the next release cycle. :-) -P On Sat, Jan

This means that if you are doing system work (yum), you MUST be using the system's version of

Dear Trevor Le 07/12/2017 à 12:58, Cooper, Trevor a écrit : > Jerome (et al)... > > I'll

Dear Philip I have to check out some details before answer you. You're right in part about the

Hi Philip: That's effectively what I did. Instead of the “rocks” commands, I used the Settings

Thanks, this sounds good, when I have the chance I'll test this. Dietmar Am Mittwoch, 22.

Uploaded ... -P On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 9:48 AM, Philip Papadopoulos <ppapad...@ucsd.edu>

Hi there! Still have some problems with 411 I edited /etc/auto.home in the frontend (I'm using

Gustavo, This is the default behavior on CentOS 7 server installed with GUI (as the frontend is).

Loading the module first fixed my problem. I initially assumed that was the intent of the python roll

Awesome! Thanks for all the work! On Tuesday, November 7, 2017 at 6:19:07 PM UTC-6, Philip

This sounds good, so I might wait for the RC. Thanks so much Dietmar

I have a procedure that I would like (willing) folks to test for a restore roll. Background: Yum is

I just installed your Slurm roll for the Rocks 7 beta and it works perfectly. Thanks! On Sunday,

I transferred the appropriate lines in passwd, shadow, group, gshadow and auto.home from a rocks 6

Thanks Nadya. I'll take a look at the dynip roll. On Wednesday, October 25, 2017 at 12:22:19 PM

That works for now. Thanks! On Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 2:59:56 PM UTC-5, Philip Papadopoulos

Folks, I'm debugging host-based authentication for CentOS7. I'm wondering if I'm missing

I'm not sure if this is the same issue, but exporting /export from the login machine to the

Thanks Trevor. On Monday, October 16, 2017 at 3:33:50 PM UTC-5, Trevor Cooper wrote: Scott, While I

Albano, Two things... First, if you don't reinstall your frontend (see below) you can generate

Not surprised... :) CentOS 7 includes openjdk out of the box not Oracle JRE/JDK which I think may be

Just to follow up for this -- The need for extra memory is because the avalanche part of Rocks (where

That worked! Thanks Philip! On Friday, October 6, 2017 at 5:59:40 PM UTC-3, Philip Papadopoulos wrote

Yes, the file has the correct contents and a manual startup of sssd service works fine at that point.

I have the same problem. At work I have to set up a proxy config in order to access internet URLs

Yes, I noticed that behavior too. The daemons do start automatically following a reboot, however.

No, no firewall adjustments -- nothing intentional, at least. But now, after a frontend reboot,

THanks, Dietmar, I replicated your experience. On my single UEFI node. I'll call this bad code in

I'll test this on Monday and report back! Thanks Dietmar