This code checks to see if the user already has the folder in their profile. If they already have the folder it will NOT recopy the template.
This allows the end users to set their own white lists should the need arise.
Once your testing as been successful and your users have the temple ready to go in their profiles you can go ahead and deploy the msi(s), starting with the x86 version. If your users are using the x64 version of Internet Explorer you will then need to deploy the x64 version afterwards.
Using adblock plus in a work environment is useful for saving bandwidth (especially useful for mobile broadband users) and reduces the risk of a user clicking on malicious adverts which would pose a security risk.
@dibdot Unsure if it's working as expected, what IP should domains in the blacklist resolve to?
My router hostname is apu and a linux box hostname on the LAN is i-5, I've tried the same after restarting dnsmasq and adblock.
The Internet standards (Requests for Comments) for protocols mandate that component hostname labels may contain only the ASCII letters 'a' through 'z' (in a case-insensitive manner), the digits '0' through '9', and the hyphen ('-'). The original specification of hostnames in RFC 952, mandated that labels could not start with a digit or with a hyphen, and must not end with a hyphen. However, a subsequent specification (RFC 1123) permitted hostname labels to start with digits. No other symbols, punctuation characters, or white space are permitted.
The stable branch is only for bug fixes - the current adblock 3.6.x development will be part of OpenWrt 19.x. Of course, you could download & install the latest adblock stuff manually on top of your 18.06.x build, just use the download links in the first post.
In the past, for commercial "standard "software packages, at least, it was good practice, to do validity checks on the input data. Which not only meant range checks for numbers.
Also, has something to do with 'egoless programming'.
Huh!? Maybe you should stick to the facts - the issue has already been resolved with this commit. Apart from that this is an Opensource project and not a commercial one (which often receive never updates) ... make us happy with your knowledge and contribute!
And according to the Luci package manager, they are the correct items. But, I don't see any of the runtime data, even though it seems that Adblock runs. I see in the logfile that it started, though the number of sitelists doesn't change from 3800 or so despite my checking more. Luci package isn't working right? Something else needed to get that version working I'm missing?
Does anyone know if it is possible to install adblock globally for all users of a computer? instead of every user having to install it individually. I would like to install it for IE, Chrome and Firefox
Today, I'll be going over two options for ad-free web browsing without root access. The first is the Chromium-based option, which looks and functions exactly like Chrome for Android. The second option is based on Firefox, and was created by the developers behind Adblock Plus.
Next, simply tap the "Download complete" notification to launch the APK installer file. From here, tap "Install," and when that's finished, press "Open." At this point, you can sign in with your Google account to sync bookmarks, auto-fill data, and open tabs just like with regular Chrome.
As #NoChromo is based on Chromium, which is the open-source version of Chrome, you'll get all of the same functionality that you're used to with Chrome for Android. Really, the only difference here is that all ads are blocked by default, so you get the best of both worlds.
At this point, you're ready to browse the web without encountering intrusive ads. The browser's main menu gives you quick access to your most commonly-visited sites and bookmarks, so you could get off and running right now if you wanted to.
As this browser is based on Mozilla's Firefox, the interface is already quite polished. Pages render quickly, and a tab-switching interface makes it easy to switch between open tabs. All the while, websites that used to contain ads will now look nice and clean.
This is a separate browser, it's not meant to work ON a browser like an add-on. What you refer to is the AdBlock plus addon (e.g. for Firefox) - and this one works on Chrome, since there is the option to download it for different browsers....
UC Browser v10.5.2 absolutely does have an adblock feature! It's available in the settings. Don't know about any of the earlier versions, the current version is the only one I've ever looked at. The adblocker addon is already installed and just needs to be enabled. The adblocker works fine and without digging into it further probably just uses the "easylist" subscription filter like the vast majority of other mobile browsers that offer adblocking. Others might like the Ui but I personally didn't care for it and the fact that it installed four different folders into my device storage was annoying, at least for me.
Can't install addons? Wow! I realize it's in beta but come on guys, ladies. A person might be able to go into about:config and modify some entries to be able to install addons but why? Would be much better off using FF, again.
#nochromo seems pretty great so far. Developer seems kind of nonchalant about it. Would happily donate to keep this current and alive. Even iOS allows ad blockers now. Chrome is saturated with ads to the point where normal browsing feels like entering a gauntlet. Rooting is also becoming next to impossible on many devices - something needs to be done. Real shame when iOS users have more control of their devices than we do.
b1e95dc632