I meant to ask the same question - the thing is, most of the ENORMOUS resequencing projects are extremely slow with catching up to the newest assemblies.
I have been told that it's mostly because of the alignment issues - it's just too expensive (and long) to re-align the whole compendium of the samples (which is now approaching 100k for ExAC for example).
Of course, things are even more dramatic for the WGS - files are just huge and alignment is not a cheap thing to accomplish (even though arguably it's better to assemble WGS reads rather than align them, or use some sort of combinations).
It seems like an excellent niche for STAR - most of the reads are the same length and the alignment can be lightning fast if properly optimized (I mean, aligning 2x150bp exome reads is a piece of cake anyway, isn't it? Most of them map uniquely with great confidence).
The only issue is proper estimation of mapping qualities. I wonder if there is a way to cut corners there.