Skyhook Drones

[Sanna Pospicil]

Foundedby BAFTA-winning drone pilot and camera operator Chris Bates in 2013

Skyhook has been in the drone filming game for over ten years, making us one of the original operators in the UK drone industry.

Outstanding service from initial contact through to the final shot and delivery. They raised the level of production far past our expectations. Very experienced in what they do, adaptable to what the day threw at us and delivered some fantastic work. Will work with them in the future and would highly recommend them to anyone who wants to take their production to the next level. Skyhook are the real deal.

Skyhook proved to be a great asset to this programme. They were ready to go and in position when required. A lot of their material made it into the final edit which we already had a number of cameras covering, so this is a testament to their work. Very easy to work with and with a number of drones to choose from.

Skyhook were great to use on our recent promotional film for Southern Water. Some stories can only be told from the air, and the footage shot for this really brought a huge sense of scale and impressiveness to the final film. Skyhook were receptive to my needs, efficient and a valuable asset to any production.

Skyhook really impresses with impeccable safety and professionalism. The versatility that they can offer with this unique way of shooting is freeing and inspiring. Not only do they offer a brilliant service but the way in which they do so is why we would use Skyhook again and again. They are incredibly easy to get on with and combined with a creative flair that will allow you to get the most out of this state of the art technology.

It was great working with the Skyhook team. They were very informative about the procedures of drone filming and accommodating while we organised locations and dates. They took direction very well and were a genuine pleasure to work with. We managed to film some dynamic beautiful footage which added an incredible perspective to the video.

SKYHOOK is a distributor of XAG drones and representing the top industry vendors including Ubiquti, Mikrotik, Cisco, HP and many more. We are the largest stockiest of our distribution brand and supplying successfully to our partners from day we established.

The suit says the technology is similar to the tail-hook mechanism that grabs incoming manned jets on the decks of aircraft carriers. It claims that Randy McDonnell invented the process in the capacity of president and sole owner of Advanced Aerospace. He founded the firm in St. Louis County prior to the Boeing merger and continues to operate it.

McDonnell filed a companion lawsuit in Washington, D.C., asking the federal government to reimburse McDonnell for profits Insitu and Boeing earned as independent contractors operating drones on behalf of the U.S. military.

Skyhook offer a suite of various CAA part 102 options where required. Our drone pilots are industry certified professionals. We carry aviation specific public liability insurance for your protection.

Jess is a popular cinematographer with a growing body of drama and documentary credits, she brings her expertise in framing and composition to her role of gimbal operator with Skyhook. Jess is also an accomplished drone pilot and has used her skills effectively on several documentary films, she is an ideal collaborator if you are considering using a drone in New Zealand.

Simon is an award winning cinematographer with numerous drama and documentary credits. He brings his expertise in camera movement to the role of drone pilot with Skyhook. As the original drone operator in New Zealand Simon has huge experience to draw from ranging from consulting for the NZ Government to piloting drones for feature films. Simon is outcome focused and able to work closely with you to achieve your production goals.

The U.S. is now supplying Ukraine with ScanEagle drones. This can spell bad news for Russian generals and ammunition handlers as the drones can help Ukrainian artillery destroy command posts and ammunition dumps.

As part of the $775 million military aid package announced by Washington on August 19, Ukraine will receive 15 ScanEagle drones. The ScanEagles are small but long-endurance UAVs that can stay in the air for almost 24 hours enabling them to provide Ukrainian artillery with real-time imagery and coordinates of Russian troops and facilities.

But for Ukraine, the ScanEagle has several attractive qualities. With the Ukraine conflict bogging down into trench warfare, a drone that can persistently surveil a sector for dug-in and well-camouflaged troops, vehicles, and installations is valuable.

Equipped with electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) and thermal imagers, ScanEagle can relay daytime and infrared imagery back to its operators, who can quickly relay data to Ukrainian artillery. While not exactly expendable at more than $4 million for a four-drone system, they are cheap enough for Ukraine to absorb the inevitable attrition as the UAVs are consumed by combat and accidents.

The use of drones in photography has added a whole new dimension to what can be done. Drones can give a birds-eye view that is quite different from a land-based photo. Software can take multiple photos and make a 360 panorama, or a 2D or 3D model. This can provide a whole new perspective to, for instance, a building construction project. Multiple photos taken from the same location over time can show a sequence of changes. Even videos can be taken, repeating the same flight path, to show changes over time.

Drones provide a unique view, showing objects that cannot be seen from the ground. Drones can be positioned in the same location time after time to take a photograph from the same angle, or video from the same camera path, to easily show changes over time.

Orbital launches by year template needs 17 more yearly templates to be created. I had decided to work on the same, this month. Anybody, interested to reduce the workload is WELCOME. All I need is an EXPERT REVIEW to be done once the template is created / or placed on the respective Spaceflight page (For eg, To check whether only Orbital launches are listed, Manned flights indicated in bold text, Uncatalogued launch failures listed in italics & Payloads deployed from other spacecraft in brackets). Also, Kindly update the below table in order to avoid duplication of work.

I recently noticed that the articles on specific GPS constellation SVs use the USA spacecraft designations, e.g. USA-183 for GPS-SVN 53. While the USA spacecraft numbers are interesting, and well-suited to retention in a list (List of USA satellites), they are not used commonly at all. GPS satellites are primarily referred to by PRN, but because this is ambiguous because PRN slots are occupied by different SVs over time, the SVN numbers are what are used by the GPS community when referring to a particular spacecraft. I would suggest renaming all of the articles on GPS satellites to GPS SVN XX or something like that per WP:COMMONNAME. Objections? Issues? Discussion? siafu (talk) 21:06, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello,

Please note that Reconnaissance satellite, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!

Delivered by Theo's Little Bot at 01:00, 17 February 2014 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team

A new article Orbiting skyhooks and an older but far shorter article Skyhook (structure) need to be merged as they are basically about the same topic. I don't know enough about the subject to do the merge myself, so I'm passing the buck here. Thanks Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Would you be interested in participating in a user study? We are a team at University of Washington studying methods for finding collaborators within a Wikipedia community. We are looking for volunteers to evaluate a new visualization tool. All you need to do is to prepare for your laptop/desktop, web camera, and speaker for video communication with Google Hangout. We will provide you with a Amazon gift card in appreciation of your time and participation. For more information about this study, please visit our wiki page ( :Finding_a_Collaborator). If you would like to participate in our user study, please send me a message at Wkmaster (talk) 16:30, 3 March 2014 (UTC).

Just an FYI that I've created an article about NASA's "Mr. Fix It" Jack Kinzler, who recently died. He was responsible for the sunshade that saved Skylab, the Lunar Flag Assembly, the Lunar plaque, and the six-iron head that Alan Shepard used to invent the sport of lunar golf. Get in there and edit! --JohnPomeranz (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Is there further consensus needed on this topic? Also, at which point do we employ collapsing? For example, GRAIL and GRACE both sensibly can be put in one line each as constellations, but TerraSAR-X and Tandem-X, since they were launched so far apart in time, might be best left separate. Does anyone care, or should I just make a sandbox version? siafu (talk) 23:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

3a8082e126