Dear All,
I hope this message finds you well, energized, and inspired.
As promised earlier today, I am delighted to share the Draft Action Planning Consultation Input Collection Template for our Strategic Plan (2025–2030).
Everything you see—content, logos, documents, and ideas—is only a starting point.
Nothing is final until all of us, as equal partners in this young and vibrant collective, have shaped it together.
This process is designed to be inclusive, participatory, and co-owned.
💡 Your voice is not only welcomed—it is essential.
We have reached a defining moment.
To transform our passion and commitment into a fully operational and influential movement, we must now establish:
Clear standards
Guiding documents
Strategic practices
These steps will position YMHC-Africa as a compelling force that donors, governments, and stakeholders cannot ignore.
Every member—without exception—is critical to every step forward.
🔗 [Join the WhatsApp & Working Groups] (https://forms.gle/sVQJKKReg7YxeFxA9)
Do you have technical or IT expertise?
We warmly invite you to create a Zoho or Google Form to capture inputs from the attached template.
This contribution, along with other vital roles, will be shared before our Second Virtual Meeting later this week.
📅 Meeting link will follow tomorrow.
Together, we are laying the foundation for a transformative plan that will elevate youth mental health across Africa.
I look forward to your insights and to connecting with each of you during our upcoming session.
With appreciation and determination,
Abass Hamza
Founder & Convener, YMHC-Africa
Dear Esteemed YMHC-Africa Members,
Warm greetings of hope and solidarity to each of you across our beautiful continent. The Youth Mental Health Collaborative Africa (YMHC-Africa) stands at a defining moment, and your voice is the power that will shape our shared future. Together, we are building a movement that will transform how Africa nurtures, protects, and empowers the mental health and well-being of its young people.
We are excited to invite you to our 2nd Virtual Meeting, which will focus on discussing, formalizing, organizing, and coordinating the drafting of the YMHC-Africa Strategic Plan 2025–2030—our blueprint for the next five years of impact and innovation. To ensure broad participation, we kindly ask all members to VOTE on their preferred meeting date and time by the close of day Sunday, 28th September 2025. The date and time with the majority vote will be announced on Monday, allowing everyone to prepare adequately.
This is more than a meeting—it is a call to action. We are also inviting volunteers to coordinate, moderate, or speak during the session. If you feel inspired to lead a segment, share insights, or help guide the conversation, please send a separate email indicating your interest and the area you wish to contribute to by the close of day Sunday.
By Monday, 29th September 2025, a draft agenda will be shared with all members, including the confirmed speakers, moderators, and coordinators, along with their names, institutions, and countries.
This is our time to dream boldly, plan strategically, and unite for Africa’s youth. Your participation is not just welcomed—it is essential. Together, we can create a Strategic Plan that reflects our shared vision of resilience, inclusion, and hope.
Kindly click on the link below to vote for your prefered date and time
VOTE HERE: LINK
Voting Deadline: Sunday 28th September, 2025 at 11:59PM GMT+0
With gratitude and determination,
Abass Hamza + Dr Ama Akamah + Dr. Moses + Dr Antonio
On behalf of the Interim YMHC-Africa Coordination Team
--
When posting, please include your name, institution/organisation
You can also start a new thread by emailing auth...@googlegroups.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rising Scholars" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to risingscholar...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/risingscholars/CAN-MQecZ0TorHW%3D4Zv%3Dn6SQYm--HcaDHPXanm5w06uCagv8fLg%40mail.gmail.com.
Deborah,
This was such an insightful inquiry—especially coming from someone who is not only exploring these questions academically but also thinking deeply about their practical application in mental health support.
I have wrestled with similar questions myself. Through my early research and my thesis focus on decolonial approaches to global mental health, I’ve seen how faith and spirituality are consistently “othered” within Western constructs of mental health support. This isn’t surprising, but it highlights how urgent it is for us, as a people, to lead the research and build the evidence base for what we already know works in our contexts. This is what led me to pursue my Phd by researching how faith is used by Black Caribbean women survivors of Gender-Based Violence for their mental health healing.
Your point about the tripartite view of the human being resonates deeply. In my work, I’ve found that ignoring the spiritual dimension leaves a gap in care—one that traditional systems in Africa have long tried to address, even if they’ve been mischaracterized or stigmatized by Western models.
I’ve been following Dr. Yusuf, a Yale professor, who has been engaging these very questions on spirituality and mental health. His work may offer a helpful starting point for you as well.
Thank you again for raising these critical questions. It’s exactly these kinds of conversations that will help shape more holistic and culturally grounded mental health care models.
Warmly,
| |||||||||||||||
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/risingscholars/CAPY7h5mipz%2Bi4h%3Dv5yZFDy1GrOZ%3D92sAkiDo2BPtQhL45KPJ1A%40mail.gmail.com.
An Overview of the Tripartite View of Humanity and Mental Health Management
1. Conceptual Clarity of the Tripartite View
The author adopts a tripartite anthropology (body, soul, spirit), drawing from biblical and cultural traditions.
While some Christian traditions affirm this model (cf. Nee, 1968), others argue for dualistic (body–soul) or holistic/monistic anthropologies (e.g., Murphy, 2006).
Contemporary neuroscience and psychology largely approach the human being as a psychosomatic unity, complicating the tripartite claim.
By assuming the tripartite view as self-evident, the author overlooks the plurality of anthropological perspectives in theology, philosophy, and science.
2. Scriptural Interpretation and Context
The cited verses (Eccl. 12:7; 2 Tim. 4:6; 2 Pet. 1:13–14) highlight the separation of body and spirit at death.
Biblical scholars, however, emphasize that nephesh (Hebrew: “soul”) and psyche (Greek: “life”) often denote whole personhood, not distinct parts (Wright, 2004).
Resurrection theology (1 Cor. 15) underscores the unity and renewal of the human person, not permanent disembodiment.
The text uses selective proof-texting and does not address alternative biblical-theological interpretations.
3. Conflating Spiritual and Medical Frameworks
The author links anthropological and biblical perspectives with African healing traditions.
While traditional healers play critical roles in African societies (Mbiti, 1991), there is a danger of essentializing them as “diviners/witches” without nuance.
The herbal efficacy claim against S. pneumoniae raises an important case for traditional medicine validation through clinical trials (WHO, 2013).
The conflation of herbal efficacy with spiritual causality risks undermining both scientific rigor and cultural respect.
4. Astral Projection and Scientific Evidence
The claim of astral projection reflects esoteric traditions but lacks scientific corroboration.
Neuroscience interprets such experiences as lucid dreaming, dissociation, or temporal lobe activity (Blackmore, 2017).
Presenting astral projection as fact undermines the text’s scholarly credibility, as it conflates subjective reports with ontological realities.
5. Mental Health as Tripartite Care
The author critiques biomedicine as “treating half the human being.”
In fact, psychiatry already employs the biopsychosocial model (Engel, 1977), with some expansions into the biopsychosocial-spiritual model (Sulmasy, 2002).
The claim of neglecting the “soul/spirit” ignores that many practitioners integrate spiritual care and cultural sensitivity in holistic treatment.
6. Ethics of Referring to Spiritual Practitioners
The text asks if psychiatrists ever refer patients to diviners.
While collaboration with traditional healers is explored in African mental health (Patel, 2011), professional ethics stress the need for evidence-based, non-harmful, and regulated practices.
Such referrals present ethical dilemmas and risk patient exploitation without clear frameworks of accountability.
7. Toward Holistic Mental Health Management
The author’s call for a holistic model resonates with current global health discussions.
WHO and global psychiatry advocate integrating cultural, spiritual, and social dimensions of health while maintaining scientific validation and ethical safeguards (Koenig, 2020).
The proposal is valuable but requires clear definitions, operational models, and empirical evidence before application in clinical contexts.
8. Summary
· The author raises valid concerns about the limitations of biomedical mental health care.
· However, the argument:
· Overstates the tripartite model as a universal truth.
· Selectively cites scripture without engaging theological counterarguments.
Regards,
To view this discussion, visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/risingscholars/78f8fe3357b21deac1e79fcb62bfb538%40mak.ac.ug.