Some typos still not corrected...

Jiří Moravec

unread,

Nov 13, 2018, 6:09:18 PM11/13/18

to riscv-xbitmanip

When I just read "Discussion" section of last v0.37-draft, I spotted typo: "adn" should be "and".

And then I remembered that in summer Luke Leighton proposed patch correcting exactly that problem:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/riscv-xbitmanip/UKpYHJsDyuE

patch : https://groups.google.com/group/riscv-xbitmanip/attach/506b35a3868bc/0001-spelling-corrections.patch

Maybe it is time to finally apply this patch...

lk...@lkcl.net

unread,

Nov 14, 2018, 2:12:53 AM11/14/18

to riscv-xbitmanip

On Tuesday, November 13, 2018 at 11:09:18 PM UTC, Jiří Moravec wrote:

When I just read "Discussion" section of last v0.37-draft, I spotted typo: "adn" should be "and".
And then I remembered that in summer Luke Leighton proposed patch correcting exactly that problem:

unfortunately, jifi, clifford removed my name from the contributor list, after posting some extreme public... well, i won't spend the time searching for the link. so after speaking indirectly with him he refused to acknowledge the contribution. as that is a systemic law violation (to not give credit for peoples' contributions, no matter how small) i asked that my contributions be removed from the document. i also stopped providing further contributions to the document.

l.

Jiří Moravec

unread,

Nov 20, 2018, 2:18:10 PM11/20/18

to riscv-xbitmanip

Patch for two spotted typos included.

Please apply...

Thanks,

Jiří Moravec

riscv-isa-xbitmanip-some-typos-correction.patch

Clifford Wolf

unread,

Nov 21, 2018, 6:20:19 AM11/21/18

to jim....@gmail.com, riscv-x...@googlegroups.com

Hi,

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 8:18 PM Jiří Moravec <jim....@gmail.com> wrote:

Patch for two spotted typos included.
Please apply...

Thanks!

I've fixed the adn => and typo.

The other one wasn't a typo. ZBitfield32 would be a standard extension, XBitfield32 a non-standard extension. So the sentence "Note that we do not propose XBitfield32 as a standard extension. There will never be a ZBitfield32 extension." is correct as it is.

regards,

- Clifford

Jiří Moravec

unread,

Nov 21, 2018, 9:47:13 AM11/21/18

to riscv-xbitmanip

The other one wasn't a typo. ZBitfield32 would be a standard extension, XBitfield32 a non-standard extension. So the sentence "Note that we do not propose XBitfield32 as a standard extension. There will never be a ZBitfield32 extension." is correct as it is.