It's basically a social barter network with Ripple as the accounting
system. To simplify things, since Ripple is already complicated
enough the first time most people encounter it, the only units are
hours, and credit limits are set by users giving each other "hearts"
as endorsements, which is useful by itself as a reputation metric
separate from any Ripple accounting.
I'm hoping that this will be more useful and usable than Ripplepay for
most people. If it proves useful, I intend to merge Villages and
Ripplepay accounts onto a common backend server, so Villages accounts
would be accessible through Ripplepay as well. Right now, though I
want to see if Villages can grow given enough attention.
Please check it out and sign up if you'd like to create a profile.
You must be endorsed by an existing user to join, but I will endorse
anyone I recognize from this list who fills out the sign-up form.
Most likely there won't be any users in your area yet, so I'm counting
on you to invite some! The goal is to enable face-to-face
transactions, not just interaction over the internet.
Let me know what you think. Thanks.
Ryan
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ripple Project" group.
To post to this group, send email to rippl...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rippleusers...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rippleusers?hl=en.
Sincerely yours,
Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
Ryan
Hopefully you will recognize my name when I send an invite, despite my minimal participation here.
I will also forward your note to the Skype chat, the Open Collective for Open Money and Alternative and Complementary Currencies.
You may know it.
Regards,
Tom
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ripple Project" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rippl...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rippleusers...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rippleusers?hl=en.
>
>
--
Andrew Miller
Note that by far the best way to get more people on is to invite them
yourself on the system rather than just sharing the link. Because if
people just come to the site and request an invitation, they're asking
me personally for an endorsement. (One feature I'd like to add is
crowd-sourcing the endorsement of invitation requests to bring people
into the system, so there would be a section where you'd see people
who want on the system and be able to endorse them into the network if
you thought they'd fit in.)
Thanks for the support. I'd love to hear more feedback once you get a
chance to play around.
Ryan
No, as I mentioned before, it's just starting, so there's probably no
one in your area yet. Try viewing posts "anywhere" instead of within
5 km.
I did get a suggestion that I should put a couple of spoof posts in
there for fun just so there's something when new people arrive and
it's empty. Maybe I should just tweak it to show all posts when you
arrive the first time?
Ryan
As a little suggestion, if the system could interact with facebook,
google+, diaspora and other social networks, it could be more viral.
Inviting people on your mail address list (import from gmail, hotmail,
etc like some social networks do) would be a nice feature too.
Thank you, Ryan.
2011/11/8, Ryan Fugger <a...@ryanfugger.com>:
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Ripple Project" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rippl...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> rippleusers...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rippleusers?hl=en.
>
>
--
Jorge Timón
Yes, I can see that helping get more people on, but for now, I'm
focusing on quality over quantity -- getting people on who really
believe in the project and are willing to help work to make it
succeed. For that, I think considering each person individually makes
sense. When you know someone personally and can give them a
testimonial, that helps.
Also, I've built in a limitation for new users: You can only give out
5 hearts for every endorsement you receive. This is so new users
don't get entangled into a web of acknowledgements/IOUs without
realizing what it means to be a Ripple intermediary or how this can
come about if they endorse a bunch of people and give them high credit
limits. This also means that you won't be able to invite everyone you
know right away -- you'll have to think of a handful who might really
be interested.
Ryan
2011/11/8, Ryan Fugger <a...@ryanfugger.com>:
Thanks. Maintaining a translation of a developing site is quite a bit
of work. My plan was to wait until the wording on the site settled
down a bit before getting translations done, but I agree it would be
nice to have some translations soon, even partial ones.
Ryan
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ripple Project" group.
To post to this group, send email to rippl...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rippleusers...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rippleusers?hl=en.
Yeah, that's a good idea. I've been mulling about how best to do
this. I'll give it some more thought. For now, it's not too big a
deal for me to get all the invitation requests and route them manually
but eventually I'll need something more automated.
> In other news I kinda ran out of hearts to give out with only 2 people
> invited.
>
> I'm happy to wait but for what its worth I feel that I personally understand
> the problems I might get into vis-a-vis having to make good on those hours
> I've put on the line - and I'd like to put more out there. I have more
> people in my own local community I'd like to get on board. Please sir can i
> have more ? ;-)
>
Good feedback. I pulled the number 5 hearts per endorsement out of
thin air, and maybe 10 is better? I've set you to have unlimited
hearts, since I trust you know what you're doing, and it's not always
clear to others that they should endorse you back. (I'll have to
think on how to encourage that more too.)
Ryan
2011/11/8, Ryan Fugger <a...@ryanfugger.com>:
--
Jorge Timón
2011/11/8, Jeffrey Cliff <jeffre...@gmail.com>:
2011/11/9, Jorge Timón <timon....@gmail.com>:
--
Jorge Timón
I could not find how can I give hearths to someone that I have found in
the list of people. Is currently a way to give hearts without inviting
the person (because he/she is already in)?
Evgeni
2011/11/9, Evgeni Pandurski <epand...@gmail.com>:
Yes, good suggestion. This is a planned feature.
Ryan
Yes, this is a tricky one. Part of limiting the hearts themselves is
limiting the credit limits people can set initially, so they don't end
up owing a lot without realizing that can even happen to them as
intermediaries.
If anyone here wants unlimited hearts to give out, let me know
privately and I'll set you up, because I trust you all know what
you're doing.
Ryan
I've added a "Share" page (bottom right sidebar) that gives you a link
to share so that you will receive the invitation requests. I've also
added facebook and twitter buttons. If someone is a twitter user,
could they test that button and let me know if it works OK for them --
I'm not a twitter user. (No need to post the tweet, just see if the
suggested tweet is OK.) Thanks.
Ryan
Thanks Jeff. I agree, the user experience needs to be as intuitive as
possible, but there should always be a link to more explanation when
people are confused. Right now that link is the "About" link at the
top, mainly the "How it works" section. I'll keep developing more
helpful copy as I work on the site. If you have any specific
suggestions, please send them to me.
Ryan
Ryan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ripple Project" group.
To post to this group, send email to rippl...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rippleusers...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rippleusers?hl=en.
Kevin
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rippleusers?hl=en.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Sincerely yours,
> Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Ripple Project" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rippl...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rippleusers
2011/11/11, Kevin <kev...@peakhope.com>:
> rippleusers...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/rippleusers?hl=en.
>
>
--
Jorge Timón
Right now, posts maintain their location when you change yours, but it
might be nice to have the option to have a post follow you.
For people with multiple locations, it would be nice to have a
dropdown to select from them when posting, and when updating your home
or session location. I'll have to think about how best to do this.
Maybe a "My Locations" page to manage multiple locations? Ideas?
Ryan
2011/11/11 Jorge Timón <timon....@gmail.com>:
Hmmm... To me it seems like the person doing the searching is more
likely the one who is going to decide how far away they want to look.
I can't imagine blocking a post from someone 11 km away just because
the poster decided that the post radius ought to be 10 km.
On ebay, the seller decides where they can/will ship to, but the buyer
decides the geographic scope of their search.
On the other hand, I do see how it might be nice to be able to
differentiate between posts that required face-to-face interaction
(location matters), and posts for transactions that can be
accomplished remotely (location doesn't matter). My initial idea was
to let the searcher decide based on what they were searching for. I
don't think I'd want to add more options on post and search unless
this really doesn't work for some reason.
Ryan
Or...posts could always have a "permanent" location, but then you could
have a batch "move" of multiple posts to a different location. It
depends on how often people would change locations and want to bring
their posts with them.
A "virtual/no location" flag for posts also seems useful.
A "My Locations" page sounds good. Any search should allow you to pick
your location, as should any post (as you said). Hopefully for the 90+%
of people who have only one location, all of that can be unobtrusive.
Kevin
1) Be able to post separately for two different cities.
2) Be able to search in both cities (they're 100 km from one another)
I also like the "no location" idea for some offers.
Maybe a list of locations for some offers too?
2011/11/12, Kevin <kev...@peakhope.com>:
I've considered this, but I'm not sure about it, for privacy reasons.
I want users to feel safe putting in their actual home address without
worrying that someone will be able to stalk them. (Technically it's
possible to triangulate someone's exact location by varying one's
location and search radius, but that would take a bit of doing.)
I also personally don't get a lot out of seeing users located on maps,
but I appreciate knowing if others do, and what it is that they like
about it.
> 2) it might be time to put it in the ccdb
> http://www.complementarycurrency.org/ccDatabase/
Done, thanks.
Ryan
2011/11/15, Alessio Stalla <alessi...@gmail.com>:
Sincerely yours,
Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
2011/11/16, Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis <xeko...@gmail.com>:
The idea was to try to get people who are really committed to the
concept initially, and who won't be put off by the fact that there's
not much there yet. You're right, there's no technical reason why
everyone needs to be connected. There could easily be separate
groups.
I have been thinking about removing the requirement to be invited
sooner rather than later...
Ryan
2011/11/16, Ryan Fugger <a...@ryanfugger.com>:
2011/11/16 Jorge Timón <timon....@gmail.com>:
Sincerely yours,
Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis
1) My friends thinking this is facebook and following me in endorsing
lots of people I can't trust without risks I'm willing to take just
because of my faith in the project and they should not take.
2) Outsourcing all those risks to Ryan and having him welcoming
heterogeneous people from all the spectrum of "monetary reformists"
and "localists" that I find to spam.
What's the best thing to do for my case?
If you think I should wait to look for people I don't trust but have a
strong incentive or a good "trust infrastructure" to start to using
village, I can do it.
I just want to know I will be able to do it.
2011/11/17, Apostolis Xekoukoulotakis <xeko...@gmail.com>:
Just go to this page:
and distribute the link you find there to wherever you wish. Use your
own judgement on the invitation requests you receive.
Ryan
2011/11/18, Ryan Fugger <a...@ryanfugger.com>:
Do you mean importing contacts from other sites like gmail, facebook,
etc. and seeing if any of them are registered users?
Ryan
But that would be nice too.
2011/11/18, Ryan Fugger <a...@ryanfugger.com>:
Yes, this is how the "people" section of the feed works. You can see
everyone, not just those in your network.
Ryan
2011/11/19, Ryan Fugger <a...@ryanfugger.com>:
Correct. I've actually just opened up the site to registrations
without invitation. I've also added a setting on the Account Settings
page to give yourself unlimited hearts if you know what you're doing.
As well, you'll now receive emails when someone accepts your
invitation or registers through your shared link.
Ryan
2011/11/22, Ryan Fugger <a...@ryanfugger.com>:
Thanks for the feedback Sepp. I'll keep working on making the purpose
of the site and the whole sign up process more clear.
> Then there is the user interface on the page, which you see once
> you're registered. It isn't really intuitive.
> I know I may not be of much help here, but an overhaul of the
> interface design - I believe - would be in order.
I've actually received a lot of feedback that people are finding the
interface quite intuitive, but your opinion is definitely noted.
Ryan
> Kind regards
> Sepp
>
>
> On Nov 22, 11:35 pm, Ryan Fugger <a...@ryanfugger.com> wrote:
> I've actually just opened up the site to registrations
>> without invitation. I've also added a setting on the Account Settings
>> page to give yourself unlimited hearts if you know what you're doing.
>> As well, you'll now receive emails when someone accepts your
>> invitation or registers through your shared link.
>>
>> Ryan
>
What do you think?
Should the language of the posts be implemented as one more label or
through a separate field?
Is it better a selector with fixed categories or just user defined labels?
2011/11/24, Ryan Fugger <a...@ryanfugger.com>:
--
Jorge Timón
I just joined Villages.cc through Jeff's invitation. What now? :)
2011/11/8 Ryan Fugger <a...@ryanfugger.com>:
> Hi everyone. I recently launched Villages.cc as a Ripple system that
> has a marketplace and discoverable user profiles:
>
> http://villages.cc
>
> It's basically a social barter network with Ripple as the accounting
> system. To simplify things, since Ripple is already complicated
> enough the first time most people encounter it, the only units are
> hours, and credit limits are set by users giving each other "hearts"
> as endorsements, which is useful by itself as a reputation metric
> separate from any Ripple accounting.
>
> I'm hoping that this will be more useful and usable than Ripplepay for
> most people. If it proves useful, I intend to merge Villages and
> Ripplepay accounts onto a common backend server, so Villages accounts
> would be accessible through Ripplepay as well. Right now, though I
> want to see if Villages can grow given enough attention.
>
> Please check it out and sign up if you'd like to create a profile.
> You must be endorsed by an existing user to join, but I will endorse
> anyone I recognize from this list who fills out the sign-up form.
> Most likely there won't be any users in your area yet, so I'm counting
> on you to invite some! The goal is to enable face-to-face
> transactions, not just interaction over the internet.
>
> Let me know what you think. Thanks.
I do find it a bit disheartening though, that when I was making a
public invite in Diaspora*, one of the people following my notices
replied he's not going to be using it because the Google integration.
I guess he meant the usage of Google Maps on Villages. I've noticed
the Diaspora* people in general are what you would call privacy
conscious and there's not much trust towards the big players like
Google & Co. So it made me wonder if it were possible to use something
like OSM (http://www.openstreetmap.org/) instead of Google Maps for
showing the locations of the users?
2011/12/7 Jaro Larnos <dignifi...@googlemail.com>:
Diaspora folks are far from security conscious, as evidenced by their
abandonment of end to end encryption pretty early on.
Retroshare does however have end to end encryption
http://retroshare.sourceforge.net/
The good news is that the lead dev or retroshare wants to implement
ripple when they get some developer resource, which would be kind of
*awesome*
You mean the end-to-end encryption of public posts as opposed to
private posts? Well, the definition of public is that it's public, so
it's pretty much nonsensical to encrypt it. I'm not too sure where
they are presently with the implementation of server-side data
encryption though. But it is still alpha so I am not complaining, yet.
> Retroshare does however have end to end encryption
> http://retroshare.sourceforge.net/
>
> The good news is that the lead dev or retroshare wants to implement
> ripple when they get some developer resource, which would be kind of
> *awesome*
Retroshare is an interesting project, and I will be keeping my eyes on
it, but I suppose I'm really looking something that I can install on a
plug server and "forget", in a similar way as I could a Diaspora pod,
or maybe in the not too far future, a FreedomBox. That way I wouldn't
need to carry my PC everywhere I go. As I understood, Retroshare is
only a p2p client of sorts, that needs to be installed on whatever
computer you want to use it on. It will use the resources on the
computer, and while it works when my computer is turned on, it ceases
to work as soon as I'm off-line. With a plug server I can go off-line
and my "shared" stuff doesn't disappear in the process, unless
Retroshare is actually more like Freenet where everything is uploaded
to a "cloud" of peers. And even that is not very reliable when
disconnecting while in the process of uploading.
Interesting nevertheless.
Diaspora are good at promotion, not so brilliant at tech, imho. My
great hope for them is that they spread the idea of distributed social
nets.
>
>> Retroshare does however have end to end encryption
>> http://retroshare.sourceforge.net/
>>
>> The good news is that the lead dev or retroshare wants to implement
>> ripple when they get some developer resource, which would be kind of
>> *awesome*
>
> Retroshare is an interesting project, and I will be keeping my eyes on
> it, but I suppose I'm really looking something that I can install on a
> plug server and "forget", in a similar way as I could a Diaspora pod,
> or maybe in the not too far future, a FreedomBox. That way I wouldn't
> need to carry my PC everywhere I go. As I understood, Retroshare is
> only a p2p client of sorts, that needs to be installed on whatever
> computer you want to use it on. It will use the resources on the
> computer, and while it works when my computer is turned on, it ceases
> to work as soon as I'm off-line. With a plug server I can go off-line
> and my "shared" stuff doesn't disappear in the process, unless
> Retroshare is actually more like Freenet where everything is uploaded
> to a "cloud" of peers. And even that is not very reliable when
> disconnecting while in the process of uploading.
Yes, if you turn your machine/plug server off, retroshare will will
turn off too
>
> Interesting nevertheless.
Freedombox and retroshare are a marriage made in heaven, since both
use GPG, it's on their todo list to evaluate.
If it includes ripple it could be that much better, since it already
has a front end for a web of trust.
Ripple is on the roadmap, but not yet resourced, If anyone wants to
build a ripple module for RS, get in touch!
2011/12/7, Melvin Carvalho <melvinc...@gmail.com>:
--
Jorge Timón
I've noticed you have already changed it, thank you.
Another thing I would like to have is an additional option for the
distance select like 100 km, to be reach Cáceres (the city we're I've
lived most of my life and which I visit very often) from Badajoz (the
city where I live now). A perfect option for me would be to have
values like "Extremadura" (the "Autonomous community" of both cities),
"Spain", "Portugal" (It's really close). But that would be much harder
and I guess it wouldn't add much to most people.
Of course, I'm still impatient about the translation of the web and
I've increased the bounty:
https://villages.cc/posts/88/
This booklet is designed to be used by groups of all kinds to promote community development by use of a cooperative business structure and cc. It especially focuses on use by council. The system can be used even in the most impoverished areas and is of course adoptable by any group using either a local currency or the cooperative business model.
Robert