Fw: [IPL] the politics of climate change

0 views
Skip to first unread message

RI Interfaith Power and Light

unread,
Dec 4, 2009, 7:50:58 AM12/4/09
to riipl-a...@googlegroups.com
fyi
Peace
Howie
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 5:40 PM
Subject: [IPL] the politics of climate change

Friends

This was sent from colleague at National Wildlife Federation who is part of our Clean Energy Works coalition in NC

So far our clergy letter signed by 50+ clergy, personal visits in DC by 5 clergy, over 600 postcards, etc have not worked on Sen Hagan, as she is now part of the Brown Dog coalition that says business trumps survival

for Earth Peace!

Richard Fireman
Public Policy Coordinator,  North Carolina Interfaith Power & Light
a program of the NC Council of Churches


Hello all,
I just came from the fall meeting of the Green Group CEOs, and I thought I’d share some interesting insights.
I don’t know that these gleanings qualify as “inside information,” but we’re not supposed to attribute comments made during the meeting, so I’ll be a bit vague about who said what and refer to everyone as “they.” The topic at hand was communicating and organizing support for the climate change legislative agenda.
What doesn’t work:
1. The person who runs perhaps a very well-known entity working on climate change said they spent $15 million this year so far on broadcast TV ads.  Despite all sorts of in-depth testing and focus groups, they do not have any evidence whatsoever that it has had any impact. So, they’re dropping that strategy in favor of highly localized cable TV buys in individual ZIP codes where they can do intensive follow-up testing. If they are correct, it turns out that a shortage of money is not the only obstacle to making an impact.
2. Despite strong creative talent producing viral Internet videos, this also has not worked. It seems that what does or does not take off and get millions of hits on the Internet is quite random. It’s not an argument against trying things now and then, just a cautionary note about the very low likelihood of success. 
3. In focus groups with young people, the only message that worked was “Obama.” Everything else (save the planet, save the wildlife, green jobs, etc) turned out to be background noise and was tuned out.
What seems to be working:
As they went on to describe what does seem to be working, it occurred to me that it is a marriage of 21st century technology with 19th century “shoe leather” methods.
It is all about highly targeted, often labor-intensive, individual relationships.  For example, they (the mysterious “they”) are using paid canvassers to collect 85,000 individual letters supporting climate change legislation. By individual, I mean they are sending canvassers to visit people in their homes to ask each person to sit down using their own stationary or whatever they have around the house and write a personal multi-paragraph letter to their congressperson or senator.  They’re even doing this in rural areas where it’s necessary to drive from house to house.  Then, on given date, all 85,000 letters will be sent (or delivered) to individual legislators.  Imagine the impact of getting 300 or 500 or 1200 actual letters from real people in their own words. 
They’ve also created a “wall” which contains videos from thousands of people who say in their own words why they care about climate change. Some people are famous (such as Stephen Hawking); most are just plain folks. I believe they said they have 1700 people on the wall from Montana alone, where Sen. Baucus is a key target.  You can see the wall at http://www.repoweramerica.org/wall/
Conclusion: 
So, as someone once said about fundraising (actually, almost everyone who knows the field, says this): “It’s all about relationships.”  All of us have developed very sophisticated filters to deal with the incessant onslaught of messages from every sort of new and old media. I mean, is anyone really all that excited to log on and find 77 new emails in the last four hours?
All things considered, it seems to reinforce – or vindicate – our strategy which, frankly, was born of economic necessity. Even groups that have access to many millions of dollars and who are the “hot” issue of the day are finding that it comes down to retail politics and to the long, slow, hard work of building relationships one-on-one.
The tools may vary from old-fashioned, face-to-face conversations to the newest high tech device. But it all needs to be used to break through the noise so that real people are talking to other real people. No shortcuts.
Best,
John
John Seager
President
Population Connection (formerly Zero Population Growth)
Suite 500
2120 L St., NW
Washington, DC  20037








____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     interfaithp...@npogroups.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
     interfaithpoweran...@npogroups.org

For all list information and functions, see:
     http://npogroups.org/lists/info/interfaithpowerandlight

message-footer.txt
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages