CambridgeEnglish Qualifications Digital have now replaced our old computer-based exams and offer you even more benefits. Watch this video tutorial for help on how to complete an C1 Advanced digital exam. Please also review this document which covers minor differences between the sample tests and the live exam.
The C1 Advanced handbook gives an overview of the exam and its place within Cambridge English examinations. This is followed by a focus on each paper and includes content, advice on preparation, and example papers.
Running a mock test gives your learners a true exam day experience, helps you understand their progress and decide if they are ready for their exam. Our interactive mock test toolkits are full of tips, strategies and materials to help you ensure your students are confident and fully prepared for their exam.
Our webinars provide you with invaluable information about our exams, and cover a wide spectrum of subjects, including effective teaching methods, tips to improve student engagement and online professional development to help you develop your career.
You can connect with a lively community of teachers on our Teaching English with Cambridge Facebook page. We regularly post teaching tips, answer your questions, and host regular Live events to give you a chance to engage with the community.
Practice your reading, writing, speaking and listening skills using these free online resources. These materials are designed to help you to develop reading for gist and detail, managing unfamiliar vocabulary, as well as planning, drafting, editing, and writing for the exam.
Test & Train is an easy-to-use practice tool to help you get ready for your C1 Advanced exam through short, sharp workouts. With over 500 practice questions, you can use it anytime, anywhere and as many times as your like!
Students entering Georgia Tech may receive college credit based upon their scores on the College Board Advanced Placement (AP) Exams taken in conjunction with designated high school advanced placement classes, SAT II Subject Tests, The International Baccalaureate, and/or Georgia Tech Departmental Exams.
Once enrolled at Georgia Tech, students are not allowed to take College Board (Advanced Placement and SAT II), International Baccalaureate, or A-Level Examinations for credit. All examinations must be completed prior to the student's enrollment date. Students who offer satisfactory evidence that they are qualified to do so may receive credit for a course by examination at Georgia Tech. Such an examination is called an Examination for Advanced Standing.
In order to see if you have earned Penn State credit based on your AP test performance, please search the list of tests by subject below. The list outlines the exact course credit you will receive at Penn State for the score received on the exam. The awarded credit may apply as general credit, may count as credit for a particular course and/or requirement, or may allow you to advance to the next in a series of courses or take an honors-level course.
I have a lot of experience writing automated tests suites for APIs in Postman. I have always used data-driven testing and as such have always been a little frustrated with Postmans limitations in this area. When I say data-driven I am trying to achieve two goals. First I want to decouple the test from the test data but more importantly, I want to be able to parameterise my tests so that I iterate over each with different data which represent different scenarios/cases. I have some API endpoints which I hit tens of times but with different data. I am looking for advice on a better way to structure and perform my testing. I will outline the issues below.
In Postman you can run a collection against a selected environment and/or a data file. The problem here is you can pass just one data file for a complete collection. While you can technically have all your required data in the single file it might become bloated that for brevity it is actually better to hard code your data in the test within the Postman UI.
What you can do is organise your collection tests into sub-directories and then select individual sub-directories to run, each using their own data. Likewise, you could split the tests up into individual collections. The big problem here is to run the whole suite of tests is no longer a click of a button but instead, you would have to go through each sub-collection of tests and run them. Linking sub-collections to test data might also become a frustration. Just as importantly, you no longer get a single concise report which is a big problem.
My workaround to date has been to use Newman to hit specific tests or groups of tests with a specific data file. This allows me to separate out my test data to match collections and also means I can kick off all my tests in one go (by firing all the commands in one go). The problem is I am still just running sub-collections when I do this and would like to end up with a single report as if all the tests were run from one collection at the same time.
My second workaround is just to just write the tests in code but this is not the ideal solution as it makes the test suite a lot more technical. Our less technical testers would not be able to contribute to the suite and someone technical would need to always be available to maintain the API tests.
My thought is to organize with sub-folder. When it comes to running as a whole with newman, execute a script beforehand to automatically combine json files as one. In this way, we can run it at both collection and sub-folder level.
The site is secure.
The ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
Purpose: To summarize performance characteristics of FITs for CRC and advanced adenomas in average-risk persons undergoing screening colonoscopy (reference standard) and to identify factors affecting these characteristics.
Study selection: Two reviewers independently screened records to identify published English-language prospective or retrospective observational studies that evaluated FIT sensitivity and specificity for colonoscopic findings in asymptomatic, average-risk adults.
Limitations: Only English-language studies were included. Incomplete reporting limited quality assessment of some evidence. Performance characteristics are for 1-time rather than serial testing.
Conclusion: Single-application FITs have moderate to high sensitivity and specificity for CRC, depending on the positivity threshold. Sensitivity of 1-time testing for advanced adenomas is low, regardless of the threshold.
Academic departments establish AP course equivalency policies for transcript notation of placement credit in their subject(s). Some departments only allow transcript notation of AP credit(s) retroactively, upon successful completion of one of their advanced courses, while others allow notation on the basis of the scores alone. Still other departments have policies that grant no AP credits whatsoever. Pertinent policies for each department are detailed at the bottom of this page.
Brown receives AP scores for most incoming students from the College Board in July if they designated Brown as a score report recipient earlier in the same year. Score processing and placement of corresponding AP credits on a student's transcript occurs during August for AP credit(s) that are not contingent on taking a higher level course at Brown.
For "Contingent" AP credit notation(s) and all other requests for AP credit notation(s) after the Decline/Accept period, students must request notation after satisfying the requirements for earning credit by going to ASK > Incoming Students > Test Scores. Follow the instructions here. No removal of AP credit from the transcript can be made after the Registrar's Course Add deadline in a student's first semester at Brown.
Upon consultation (mandatory) with the responsible dean in The College, some students may be able to apply for advanced semester standing in their sophomore or junior year. Students with a semester of Advanced Standing from AP credits should remember that AP credits will not increase their course credit count; in order to graduate, they must still successfully complete enough courses to earn at least 30 course credits, and they must plan to do so in 7 rather than 8 semesters.
Since these policies are subject to change, students are advised to confirm AP credit policies with the appropriate department(s). Additional information may be found on department websites or by consulting the departmental AP advisor. The policies below apply to all incoming Brown undergraduates, including transfer students.
5: earns an AP credit unassigned in History of Art and Architecture upon the successful completion of a 1000-level (advanced) History of Art and Architecture department seminar at Brown (excluding courses taken during study abroad), effective December 12, 2017.
Students with a score of 4 or 5 can place into CHEM 0330 without taking the Brown Chemistry Placement Exam. A retroactive placement notation for CHEM 0100 can be granted with a minimum AP Chemistry score of 3 and upon successful completion of CHEM 0330.
No AP credit or automatic placement. Placement into CSCI 0190 (our accelerated intro course option often taken by students with AP or IB experience) occurs as a sequence of summer assignments beginning in late June. See the department page on intro course selection for more information.
Students may earn AP credit for Economics 0110 if they have both a) 4 or 5 in Macroeconomics and b) 4 or 5 in Microeconomics. However, they cannot count such placement credit for Economics 0110 toward concentration requirements. Economics concentrators who place out of Econ 0110 must take an additional 1000-level course to meet the concentration requirements.
5: earns AP credit for 1 unassigned history course upon the successful completion of any one 1000-level course in European history, including cross-listed courses, but excluding courses taken during study abroad.
3a8082e126