Fwd: ...TELLING the FACTS...

[b]

-----Original Message-----
From: b <rrdd...@aol.com>
To: rrdd3939 <rrdd...@aol.com>
Sent: Wed, Jun 26, 2013 1:26 pm
Subject: ...TELLING the FACTS...

                    MOMUS: OFFENDING with TRUTH:   

            It Isn't Bigoted/Racist when Telling the Facts

             by Richard DePersio with Citizen Journalist

(It goes without saying that we want everyone to revel in

our Grade 'A' prose but, we especially, want moderates to

focus in on what is about to transpire. The ignorant and libs

are excused from participation).

 Three strikes and you're out...The government shouldn't be

in the business of legally sanctioning that which is: A)

Immoral - according to the Bible; B) Abnormal/Unnatural -

according to pre-politicized traditional psychology/psychiatry

(decades of research was summarily sacrificed at the lib alter

in the early '80s due to pressure from gay and feminist orgs and

lobbies --- psychiatry still has the nerve to call itself a medical

science and psychology a social science!); C) Freak (bad

 mutations - according to evolution). The U.S. Supreme Court

has spoken now and it is clear as to how they will rule on

the issue in the future. It has once again chosen to redefine

society - grossly exceeding its constitutional parameters.

      We don't subscribe to the view that they are born that way -

which is the lib position. Last year, the prestigious John Hopkins

 Medical Center declared that pedophiles are likely born that way!

 Making excuses for bad behavior!: The field of sociobiology was

born in the early '60s claiming the genes play a role in personality,

as well as, one's moral and behavioral make-up. Going beyond

traditional biology: genes determine skin color, hair texture. etc,;

whether or not you are born with a congenital or hereditary disease.

The majority of geneticists, biochemists and evolutionary biologists

 posit that you can be born with a strong nasty gene or greedy gene

 or criminal gene (hence lib contention that criminals shouldn't be

punished to severely) or home gene, therefore, you are very

likely to grow-up with that trait. A minority claim that it is part

biology/nature and part environment/nurture. Why not just say:

nurture? If you are born with a strong timid gene but nurture will

ultimately be the determining  factor - just drop nature!

According to the Bible God gave us free will and according to

the science of biology, humans have the most advanced brains,

consequently, they aren't slaves of their biology. You are the

product of everything that you learned in the order that you

learned it, everything that you experienced in the order that you

experienced it and everyone you have known - in most cases,

parents being the biggest influence. Trillions of bits of information.

 And, in most cases, it might be impossible to determine why an

 individual has a major or minor floor --- but, it doesn't mean that

society should embrace it! People can change but they have to

consciously and subconsciously want to do so. The older you get,

the more difficult it becomes. It doesn't mean that society should

embrace abnormal/unnatural/immoral behavior.

      Nobody cares what they do in private out of eyeshot of

and not involving children. They claimed to be victims of

verbal and physical gay bashing --- stay in the damn closet!!!

No one should go around talking about their personal sexual

preferences, especially, those of the anomalous or kinky variety

and not expect to be teased BIG-time (physical is wrong).

     Why should less than 5% threaten a hallmark of Western

Civilization: Traditional Marriage. Another example of minority

rule spearheaded by the 20% who identify themselves as libs

and  largely control: movie, newspaper, magazine and television

industries; public and private (first 'p' more so than second 'p')

elementary/high schools and colleges.

     Most states require that first graders be taught that all

households are equal: mom/dad; single-parent; two moms;

 two dads. This in spite of the fact that study after study, over the

last 15 years, has shown that a child is best off in a mom-dad

household functional followed by mom-dad dysfunctional followed

by single parent functional followed by single parent dysfunctional

in determining the likelihood that they will become teens who take

illegal drugs, drop out of school, commit a crime, etc.

Which strongly implies two moms or dads not in the best interest

of the child. Publics schools are institutions of indoctrination not

education. First-graders are also told the unions are glorious

 serving as a foundations for distortions involving unions and

 corporations which will come later.

      What do you expect? When over 60% of public elementary

schools teachers, over 75% of their high school teachers and over

90% of the college professors share a lib philosophy. Either children

aren't taught both sides of an issue or they are taught both sides

with their side presented more favorably and as making more

sense. This is true of some many issues, including, being green/

global warming, capitalism, Robber Barons/corporations, unions.

Islam, Christianity, Founding Fathers/Founding Docs, genders.

Christianity, Islam.

Who knows more about Muslims: Presidents or Muslims?...A few

years ago, during the same week, we heard a former Muslim turned

Christian women on the 700 Club (which we rarely watch as we

are deists) and a radical Muslim cleric on Sky News in the U.K.

carried on Fox, both state that Islam was a religion of violence.

Further, they stated that while only a few per cent might be terrorists

 or radicals totally 20% that at least an additional 40% of the 80%

 claiming to be moderates were really radicals masquerading as

moderates or moderates who could easily be turned into radicals or

terrorists.

       Is it any wonder that A) Most so-called moderate U.S. muslim

leaders, including, clerics don't speak out against terrorism anywhere

 in the world. including, here and those that do, do so in a perfunctory

 fashion and B) that most so-called moderate mosques in the U.S.

receive contributions from the muslim Brotherhood which aided and

abetted Hitler during WW2 and, currently, helps fund hamas and

hezbollah. (Lower-case letters intentional).

      Libs want to recreate society. Now, that B.O. will allow women in

combat will standards be lowered so that they pass. Women don't

train with, compete with and aren't graded as toughly as men already

on mental and physical tests so that they can play support soldier.

Will they further endanger themselves and others when they become

He-women!?! Eventually, will they join Special Forces so that they can

play there as well?

      Military moral should trump lib social experimentation. Do you

think that real soldiers support this decision of their commander-in-

chief. A study conducted just prior to his allowing homos to serve

openly showed that over 50% of Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen opposed it

while just under 40% favored and 10%  were undecided; over 60% of

Marines and Special Forces opposed. BO doesn't care about those who

 do the fighting!

     Add immigration reform and you are witnessing the death of Western

Civilization!!!

     (We imploy you to read new, recent and older posts at

www.rickcmtsite.blogspot.com www.pan-multiverse.blogspot.com

www.cj-rickaddsite.blogspot.com and the issues covered here, as well as,

other issues related to social policy and more).