Yes it is not supported now. Question is: Will be ever supported? And Why we pay 3x more for lack of this features. I bought nuendo as flagship in DAW and I am forced to live on unsupported edge? Why? Every time I see some cool new feature from Steinberg it is for Cubase why not Cubase and Nuendo automatically?
for an upcoming project I want to setup a backup tracking on a ProTools System via MMC-Sync. The Main-System is Nuendo 10 with Nuage Fader and Master. The Backup will be a Mac Mini with ProTools, which should react to the Transport from the Nuage. Audio over DANTE and DVS (MacMini).
Ive already gained some results. Both systems are connected via BomeNet MIDI Network. Nuendo sends the MMC to the Reader Port of PT. Transport and Sync looking fine. The only problem now is that the record in PT wont start when I press the record button on the Nuage unless I press the record button in PT first (Record Ready). That is unfortunately not the workaround I was looking for.
In the calibration curve assignment section of the SoundID Reference plugin, you can select which calibration curve will be applied to which channel and then play a test tone to ensure that the right calibration curve is applied to the intended speaker. For more details on this topic, we recommend going through this guide: Setting up with multichannel DAW plugin
Note that the SoundID Reference plugin allows you open calibration profiles where the number of channels in the measured profile is bigger than the number of channels on the master track and correspondingly in the plugin. For instance, you can open a 9.1.6 profile (16 total channels in the profile) in a plugin on a 7.1.4 (12 total channels in the plugin) or 2.0 DAW project master tracks. In such a case, the plugin will process as many channels as there are in the track on which the plugin is loaded up to the maximum channel amount in the loaded calibration profile. Calibration curves can be reassigned in the calibration curve assignment section of the plugin.
You said it was running on another computer before you installed it on your main one and it worked on that one. What is the difference between the 2? Is Scaler still working on that one with Nuendo 12?
Disabling accelerated GPU in our DAW settings seemed to do the trick. Turning off just OpenGL was not enough. This is unfortunate since we do some TV soundtrack production here but at least we have a way of using Scaler now. It seems like this issue is reproduce-able so we can find the dump files if its of use to anyone. Thank you very much for all of your help, especially jamieh!
I have two HDSPe cards in one DAW - one AES and one MADI (non-FX). All of a sudden these cards are seen in a different order by Nuendo 11, with the disastrous result that my whole Auro-3D monitoring setup (plus the inserts in Nuendo's "Control Room"!!) got lost. To add insult to injury - I can't set back the order seen by Nuendo any more (see screenshot):
I just tried to counter-intuitively change the order in the Global-tab, which in facts makes Nuendo "see" the cards in a different order again, but still all the settings created for this system aren't valid anymore (see screenshot):
The driver settings in my very first screenshot show the intended (and previously working) setup: AES = 1, MADI = 2. But all of a sudden, this order hasn't been "seen" properly any more - hence my initial posting.
Following your suggestion I changed the order of cards in the "Global" tab. Nuendo (and other apps) now "see" AES card as the first one (indicated by the number between the brackets), although the driver lists it as second one.
PS: It seems as it is a hardware-problem rather than a settings issue. This DAW is a dual-boot hybrid, so I'm able to use OS-X with the very same hardware. ProTools sees both cards as expected, but like under Windows there's no sound produced by the AES card, just by the MADI card.
In fact, both cards are now working again, so it may indeed have been a hardware issue that caused the initial problem. But the order of the cards shown by the ASIO driver is still reversed. Is there any way (for mere mortals like me) to fix this?
The device number in the brackets is crucial for ASIO applications, it seems. Nuendo's routing relies on it entirely, for example. All existing projects will open without (or with erratical) output routing.
Re: "Reset all I/Os": That's part of the problem: It just doesn't get reset, at least not the part that's seen by the ASIO applications. I just had an hour-long TeamViewer-session with my system assembler, but neither him nor I can find the place where this info got stored. Maybe the file is write-protected, somehow? (I do all of this with Administrator rights).
Of course that doesn't explain why they change their numbering in the first place. This could have been caused by a Windows, BIOS or motherboard driver update. Windows assigns these numbers with specific rules, like numbering of the PCIe slots from the motherboard up to the serial number of the device. The method also changed over all the Windows versions, so I am not sure what the current method is.
I already removed and re-inserted both cards, I re-installed the drivers - still nothing changed in the way how the cards are presented within the ASIO applications. If there's just one of the two, there's no additional numbering in brackets shown. As soon as there are both the numbering is there, and since two days it's wrong.
I thought that I should simply surrender and tried to set up a new output routing for Nuendo with the new, "wrong" card order - just to realize that now DigiCheck doesn't "hear" the cards' outputs anymore:
Thanks for your time, Matthias. I think we still don't talk about the same issue ("Wir reden aneinander vorbei."), as I didn't change _anything_ manually, except by using the driver's Global Tab - like you suggested.
It seems that I have to re-do every routing-related setting in all of my existing projects in any case, so I can very well start from zero with a completely new concept. After all, the multi-card system had mostly historical reasons to begin with. I never encountered any severe problems related to RME-cards before, but apparently that's different under Windows 10.
Unlike Pro Tools, in Nuendo all the key commands can be re-assigned. Nuendo includes some presets to help accommodate users coming from other DAWs. I started off by switching my key commands to the Pro Tools preset. To do this:
Now the scrolling will be more natural and similar to Pro Tools or Logic. And,because we made the modifier the Shift key, only during a horizontal scroll will the mousewheel reverse. Normal scrolling without Shift will still be correct.
Never actually went back on this to say the solution i Found for Nuendo 7 (confirmed also for nuendo 8) for those who might have the same issue. Your answer is along the same lines. Here is what I did.
I can't get SYS Link to work. first of all.. i don't know how to select the Spdif out in SB live ( I tried both drivers: KX and the one that comes with win XP ) .
i read the SX manual and made all correct ( i think ) ...
Now the computers should be locked one to another, but they aren't..
I think the major problem is my SB live. 'cos it's not a pro card
Why on earth does someone buy Nuendo and SX and try to use a SB card? :p
Anyways, Does the ASIO driver show up in Nuendo? If so then you need to most likely enable the SPDIF in the ASIO multimedia Setup. Either that or the properties of the SB card somewhere in the device manager. Once you have found that digital out enabling function in Nuendo set the input to the SPDIF IN..set the output of SX to the Gina SPDIF out...you do not need to send the SPDIF back and forth to each other. It actually confuses it more so than anything.
Opus
Opus
Yo Opuss.. thx for your Quick reply...
This nuendo is from my studio... i closed the studio for 15 days for maintence.... and im with the dongle at home to play a little with it.... thats why im using Nuendo with Sb live.. :)
Consider Kontakt, for example. You can load many GB of data into that and have it resident in RAM. This data is not saved into your Cubase project file size, but rather reloads into Kontakt when you load the project. I think this is possible for Renoise.
I totally get the modular/patch-cable thought process. It does help to solidify ideas as you move forward through your sound design. However, I feel that the efficacy of this starts to unravel into chaos as things become increasingly complex.
I am interested in hearing more about this approach. I am a new user of Renoise/Redux. I recently made the jump to Nuendo 13 on Win 10 and am trying to move forward with only VST3s. I have Plogue Bidule and the VST3 installed, and the current version of Renoise. I am struggling to get any of this work in my composing template.
If I load the bidule VST3 in the Rack and choose the rewire example, I do not even show the correct modules, but if I load Bidule as an app, it does. Even if I run Bidule as an app, I can not seem to make it a Rewire master.
(Also, going back a ways, but to explain why anyone would bother with this:
Tools like JACK and soundflower are cool, but not a replacement for Rewire. Rewire syncs your DAWs and you can right click and offline bounce up to 32 tracks easily from Renoise as if it were a multichannel plugin in Nuendo. Going back to virtual midi and audio cables makes for way more work and time. It truly sucks that nothing out there adequately replaces this)
Other goodies include the SuperVision suite of metering tools. This made its debut in the recent Cubase 11 update, but in Nuendo it's enhanced with a host of AV and broadcast-oriented features, including the Netflix Loudness Meter, which helps you conform your dialogue levels to Netflix standards.
The new version of Nuendo also includes a number of sound design and music-oriented tools, such as SpectraLayers One, surround support for the MultiTap Delay plug-in, the Squasher and MultiBand Imager processors from Cubase 11, and a hugely expanded library of sounds, loops and instrument patches.
b1e95dc632