Mock Congress

8 views
Skip to first unread message

Mr. Heinerichs

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:04:01 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
What bill are you for or against so far in our Congress? Tell us
why.....

Jimmy Gormley

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:09:45 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
I am for the sasquatch supportment act i think it is a topic that
interests many people, so if money is donate towards sasquatch
finding. We could do one sweep of America and if he is found or no
found we can finally know the truth.

jackie land

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:10:31 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
I am against the Sasquatch bill because we are up against very crucial
global problems right now that REALLY need our help. Money is needed
severely to repair the problems and suddenly stopping all of that to
chase after an myth that may or may not be true might cause us more
money to give up. Not every citizen wants to give up money. They have
their own problems as well that might need to be placed ahead of first
before something such as this.

On Apr 24, 11:04 am, "Mr. Heinerichs" <kh5...@gmail.com> wrote:

Megan Jarrell

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:11:44 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
I am for Stem Cell research bill. I think that if the babies are
already aborted, why not use their cells to help cure other diseases.
It will help save millions of lives and it is a great bill to pass.

On Apr 24, 11:04 am, "Mr. Heinerichs" <kh5...@gmail.com> wrote:

olivia jevnick

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:12:06 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
I am against the finding sasquash bill because in order to find
sasquash you have to use earmarks. That goes against my bill of
wasting earmark money on stupid things. If sasquash IS real, what
would we do once it is found? There is no use in this bill and will
not help the US in anyway but to waste money that we do not have. We
are already trillions of dollars in debt and that money could go
towards more useful things.

On Apr 24, 11:04 am, "Mr. Heinerichs" <kh5...@gmail.com> wrote:

taylor ford

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:12:24 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
I am strongly against the finding big foot bill. There is no such
thing. I believe the bill is asking for too much money on something
that has no prof. I think that Bill should be reviewed and be
revoted.

On Apr 24, 11:04 am, "Mr. Heinerichs" <kh5...@gmail.com> wrote:

Jack Provence

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:12:57 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
So far I most strongly support the Sasquatch Supportment Act. I am for
this bill because I think that government spending should go to a
better cause such as the discovery of sasquatches. This could lead to
more intelligent studies in science and more. I really hope Congress
goes all the way with this bill to pass it because I am not a
Sasquatch believer, I am a knower.

On Apr 24, 11:04 am, "Mr. Heinerichs" <kh5...@gmail.com> wrote:

Julianne Spingler

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:14:20 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
A bill I am for so far in this class is the Stem Cell Research Bill
because I believe that by prohibiting a practice that is such an
advancement in science, we are going against a very blatant part of
our Constitution that fosters the very practice of moving forward.
Being from a family with a member that has a degenerative disease, I
would want any type of treatment that would allow people who suffer
from illnesses such as MS or ALS should not have to receive the
diagnosis as a death sentence, which it is now, but for there to be a
cure. So many lives would be saved, and in comparison to the usage of
discarded embryos from fertility clinics, stem cell research would do
more good than harm. We have a new president, a new type of
government, and we live in an ever-changing world. If we prevent
ourselves from expanding our knowledge, especially one in the medical
field, we are preventing ourselves from the future.

On Apr 24, 11:04 am, "Mr. Heinerichs" <kh5...@gmail.com> wrote:

kevin ryan

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:14:43 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
I am also for the Sasquatch Supportment Act I feel it really could
help scientific studies. Also we waste so much money on sciences, and
we get no where but with the findings of Big Foot it could help find a
missing link that we are searching for.

Justin Wright

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:15:18 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
The Sasquatch Supportment Act has the deepest emotions that my body
can muster up in a three page bill. Sasquatches do exist. With money
funding this conflict, the Sasquatch Supportment Act reigns supreme
over all other bills.

On Apr 24, 11:04 am, "Mr. Heinerichs" <kh5...@gmail.com> wrote:

Kori Meighan

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:15:29 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
The bills I am for the most so far are the Earmark Limitation Act
because Olivia had a really great speech and presentation, and her
statistics made it very easy for me to see why she would want to pass
this bill.
I am very against the Sasquatch bill mainly because I personally do
not think it is important to be searching for a sasquatch and I don't
think we can afford that kind of money Justin is asking for.
On Apr 24, 11:04 am, "Mr. Heinerichs" <kh5...@gmail.com> wrote:

Michael Chmielowski

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:16:44 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
I am for the Stem Cell Research Act because it says in our
Constitution that our Congress has the power to promote the progress
of science. By making stem cell research illegal, we are doing the
complete opposite. There are people out there dying of diseases that
we could know how to cure if scientists had the resources, but we
don't. I'm not exactly sure why anyone would want to halt our progress
in the knowledge of life threatening diseases, but this needs to
change.

On Apr 24, 11:04 am, "Mr. Heinerichs" <kh5...@gmail.com> wrote:

Matt Zang

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:17:20 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
I am for the Sasquatch Supportment Act because i think it is a great
idea to finally find them. I believe it will put some excitement back
into a economy that is in a struggle right now. If this act becomes a
earmark and receives money, it will create more jobs for the
unemployed.

On Apr 24, 11:04 am, "Mr. Heinerichs" <kh5...@gmail.com> wrote:

amanda mcgurk

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:18:22 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
So far I am strongly for stem cell research because not only can it
help millions of people with degenerate diseases, but it also is not
harming anything. By using embryos from fertility clinics, stem cell
research will stop them embryos from being thrown out, and instead
will be reproduced for a good reason.

On Apr 24, 11:04 am, "Mr. Heinerichs" <kh5...@gmail.com> wrote:

Jack Provence

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:18:46 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
Its actually called The Sasquatch Supportment Act. Please get it right
next time.

darrius gaymon

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:20:01 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar

I am for the finding big foot bill because this would be big for the
human race finding big foot could help us find new medicines and see
if we are related to it in any way people against the big foot act
complain about it being a waste of money but i believe if big foot is
found it will be money well spent and have a positive out come

Jack Provence

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:20:20 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
The discovery of sasquatch is actually the most important issue in our
world today. I strongly disagree your opinion.

Ben Trendle

unread,
Apr 24, 2012, 11:20:40 AM4/24/12
to Senior Seminar
I am for the stem cell research bill. Stem cells offer a serious depth
of possible health advantages, and concerns for life are not valid
rebuttals at this point now because stem cells can be harvested from
healthy adults.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages